Protocol for a scoping review for risk prediction models for identifying late-onset cardiotoxic effects in cancer survivors for use in a primary care setting
Brady Bates, O.; Grecu, A. N.; Emery, J.; Stokes, D.; Cullen, W.; Gallagher, J.
Show abstract
RationaleAfter completing treatment for cancer, survivors may experience late cardiotoxic effects: consequences of treatment that persist or arise after a latent period. Primary care providers are well situated to manage these effects. Risk prediction models may assist with this. PurposeTo identify and describe all models that predict the risk of late effects and could be used in an ambulatory care setting. Data sourcesSearches will be conducted across MEDLINE and EMBASE supplemented by manual reference list reviews and targeted grey literature searches using Google. Study SelectionStudies to be included are those describing models that 1) predicted the absolute risk of a late cardiotoxic effect present at least one year post-treatment, across all cancer treatment modalities, and 2) could be used in an ambulatory care clinical setting, Data Extraction & SynthesisData will be extracted as per the CHARMS checklist, an assessment of bias will be conducted as per the McGinn Checklist. DiscussionThis scoping review will comprehensively map existing tools for risk prediction of the late cardiotoxic effects of cancer therapy in cancer survivors, applicable to an ambulatory care setting. RegistrationThis protocol was registered on 21.6.25 to Zenodo : 10.5281/zenodo.15708760 Key MessagesO_LICancer survivors face a significant long-term risk of late-onset cardiotoxicity, often undetected until advanced stages. C_LIO_LIThis review will identify and map validated multivariable risk prediction models that could support the early identification of cardiotoxicity in ambulatory and primary care settings. C_LIO_LIIntegrating prediction tools into primary care may help address growing oncology workforce gaps while enabling timely, risk-adapted cardiovascular follow-up. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Surgical Resection, Radiotherapy, And Percutaneous Thermal Ablation for Treatment of Stage 1 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis 93%
- Patterns of peritoneal dissemination and response to systemic chemotherapy in common and rare peritoneal tumors treated by cytoreductive surgery: Study protocol of a prospective, multi-center, observational study 93%
- Palliative care in the treatment of women with breast cancer: a scoping review protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Study Protocol: LIAM Mc Trial (Linking In with Advice and supports for Men impacted by Metastatic cancer) 94%
- A Core Outcome Set to evaluate the impact of prognostication in people living with advanced cancer: an international consensus study 94%
- Do people with disabilities experience disparities in cancer care? A systematic review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors affecting COVID-19 outcomes in cancer patients - A first report from Guys Cancer Centre in London 93%
- Underlying reasons for post-mortem diagnosed lung cancer cases – A robust retrospective comparative study from Hungary (HULC study) 90%
- mTOR inhibitors as radiosensitizers in neuroendocrine neoplasms 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors on new-onset overall cancer in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a population-based study 91%
- Can Large Language Models Aid Caregivers of Pediatric Cancer Patients in Information Seeking? A Cross-Sectional Investigation 91%
- COVID-19 Outcomes in Patients with Cancer: Findings from the University of California Health System Database 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Study Protocol of A Phase II Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Neo-adjuvant Pembrolizumab and Radiotherapy in Localized Rectal Cancer 92%
- Landscape of Clinical Trials in Cancer Cachexia: Assessment of Trends From 1995-2024 92%
- Assessing awareness of blood cancer symptoms and barriers to symptomatic presentation: Measure development and results from a population survey in the UK 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.