Psilocybin treatment for symptoms of depression: a living systematic review, meta-analysis, and data resource
Singleton, S. P.; Sevchik, B. L.; Lahey, A.; Cuijpers, P.; Harrer, M.; Jones, M. T.; Nayak, S. M.; Strain, E. C.; Vandekar, S. N.; Dworkin, R. H.; Scott, J. C.; Satterthwaite, T. D.
Show abstract
ImportanceDepression is a major cause of disability worldwide, motivating substantial interest in psilocybin as a potential treatment. ObjectiveTo conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of psilocybins impact on depressive symptoms and provide a living open data resource. Data SourcesPubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and PsycINFO retrieved by a systematic search up to July 1, 2025. Study SelectionWe included randomized controlled trials of psilocybin or psilocybin-assisted therapy compared against a placebo or waitlist condition. Data Extraction and SynthesisData extraction was completed independently by two extractors. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to synthesize data. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochranes RoB 2.0 tool. Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe main outcome was the standardized mean difference (Hedges g) in depression scores at the primary study endpoint. ResultsTwelve studies comprising 711 participants were included in the database, with nine of those studies (n = 529) included in our primary model. Of the nine studies included in the primary model, two had a high risk of bias, four had some concerns, while three had a low risk of bias. Compared to control conditions, psilocybin showed a greater reduction in depression scores, with a pooled Hedges g = -0.91 (95% CI, [-1.35; -0.48]; k = 9; p = 0.0013, I2 = 58.1%, tau2 = 0.13, n = 501). Sensitivity analyses revealed robust effects consistent with the primary model across a variety of design parameters and analysis choices, while also suggesting that waitlist control and crossover design studies contribute a large amount of heterogeneity to the primary model. Meta-regression revealed that psilocybins effects were rapid and consistent over several weeks (intercept = -0.92 [-1.26; -0.58], p < 0.0001; slope = 0.0009 [-0.0023; 0.0041], p = 0.57). Conclusions and RelevanceThis systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that psilocybin-assisted therapy results in substantial decreases in depressive symptoms across studies to date. However, many studies have small sample sizes or risk of bias. This living systematic review, meta-analysis, database, and online dashboard will continue to be updated as evidence emerges, providing a valuable resource for researchers in a rapidly evolving field. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSWhat is the efficacy of psilocybin or psilocybin-assisted therapy for depressive symptoms? FindingsIn this living systematic review and meta-analysis, the initial evidence suggests that psilocybin is more effective in reducing depression symptoms compared to control conditions. Our publicly released database and interactive dashboard contains over 200 effect sizes from 12 randomized clinical trials testing psilocybins impacts on depression and will be updated regularly to keep pace with this rapidly moving field. MeaningThe current evidence suggests promise for psilocybin therapy for depression, though more studies are needed.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Depression is Associated with Treatment Response Trajectories in Adults with Prolonged Grief Disorder: A Machine Learning Analysis 94%
- Consistent Differential Effects of Bupropion and Mirtazapine in Major Depression 94%
- Oral Ketamine for the Treatment of Depression: A randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations of cannabis use, tobacco use and incident anxiety, mood, and psychotic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Sociodemographic, clinical, and genetic factors associated with self-reported antidepressant response outcomes in the UK Biobank 93%
- A computational approach to understanding effort-based decision-making in depression 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-session intervention with and without video support to prevent the worsening of emotional distress among healthcare workers during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a randomized clinical trial 94%
- The development and validation of a prognostic model to predict relapse in adults with remitted depression in primary care: secondary analysis of pooled individual participant data from multiple studies 93%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Antidepressant Prescribing with a focus on people with learning disability and autism: An interrupted time-series analysis in England using OpenSAFELY-TPP 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Noninvasive brain stimulation combined with evidence-based psychotherapy for psychiatric disorders: A meta-analysis of optimal implementation parameters 92%
- From Feasibility to Utility: A Meta-Analysis of Amygdala-Neurofeedback 91%
- Common and separable neural alterations in adult and adolescent depression – evidence from neuroimaging meta-analyses 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.