Back

Psilocybin treatment for symptoms of depression: a living systematic review, meta-analysis, and data resource

Singleton, S. P.; Sevchik, B. L.; Lahey, A.; Cuijpers, P.; Harrer, M.; Jones, M. T.; Nayak, S. M.; Strain, E. C.; Vandekar, S. N.; Dworkin, R. H.; Scott, J. C.; Satterthwaite, T. D.

2025-08-16 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.08.13.25333530 medRxiv
Show abstract

ImportanceDepression is a major cause of disability worldwide, motivating substantial interest in psilocybin as a potential treatment. ObjectiveTo conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of psilocybins impact on depressive symptoms and provide a living open data resource. Data SourcesPubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and PsycINFO retrieved by a systematic search up to July 1, 2025. Study SelectionWe included randomized controlled trials of psilocybin or psilocybin-assisted therapy compared against a placebo or waitlist condition. Data Extraction and SynthesisData extraction was completed independently by two extractors. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to synthesize data. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochranes RoB 2.0 tool. Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe main outcome was the standardized mean difference (Hedges g) in depression scores at the primary study endpoint. ResultsTwelve studies comprising 711 participants were included in the database, with nine of those studies (n = 529) included in our primary model. Of the nine studies included in the primary model, two had a high risk of bias, four had some concerns, while three had a low risk of bias. Compared to control conditions, psilocybin showed a greater reduction in depression scores, with a pooled Hedges g = -0.91 (95% CI, [-1.35; -0.48]; k = 9; p = 0.0013, I2 = 58.1%, tau2 = 0.13, n = 501). Sensitivity analyses revealed robust effects consistent with the primary model across a variety of design parameters and analysis choices, while also suggesting that waitlist control and crossover design studies contribute a large amount of heterogeneity to the primary model. Meta-regression revealed that psilocybins effects were rapid and consistent over several weeks (intercept = -0.92 [-1.26; -0.58], p < 0.0001; slope = 0.0009 [-0.0023; 0.0041], p = 0.57). Conclusions and RelevanceThis systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that psilocybin-assisted therapy results in substantial decreases in depressive symptoms across studies to date. However, many studies have small sample sizes or risk of bias. This living systematic review, meta-analysis, database, and online dashboard will continue to be updated as evidence emerges, providing a valuable resource for researchers in a rapidly evolving field. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSWhat is the efficacy of psilocybin or psilocybin-assisted therapy for depressive symptoms? FindingsIn this living systematic review and meta-analysis, the initial evidence suggests that psilocybin is more effective in reducing depression symptoms compared to control conditions. Our publicly released database and interactive dashboard contains over 200 effect sizes from 12 randomized clinical trials testing psilocybins impacts on depression and will be updated regularly to keep pace with this rapidly moving field. MeaningThe current evidence suggests promise for psilocybin therapy for depression, though more studies are needed.

Published in Nature Mental Health (predicted rank #14) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.