PrimateFace: A Machine Learning Resource for Automated Face Analysis in Human and Non-human Primates
Parodi, F.; Matelsky, J.; Lamacchia, A.; Segado, M.; Jiang, Y.; Regla-Vargas, A.; Sofi, L.; Kimock, C.; Waller, B. M.; Platt, M.; Kording, K. P.
Show abstract
Machine learning has revolutionized human face analysis, but equivalent tools for non-human primates remain limited and species-specific, hindering progress in neuroscience, anthropology, and conservation. Here, we present PrimateFace, a comprehensive, cross-species platform for primate facial analysis comprising a systematically curated dataset of 260,000+ images spanning over 60 genera, including a genus-balanced subset of 60,000 images, annotated with bounding boxes and facial landmark configurations. Face detection and facial landmark estimation models trained on PrimateFace achieve high cross-species performance, from tarsiers to gorillas, achieving performance comparable to baseline models trained exclusively on human data (0.34 vs. 0.39 mAP for face detection; 0.061 vs. 0.053 normalized landmark error), demonstrating the generalization benefits of cross-species training. PrimateFace enables diverse downstream applications including individual recognition, gaze analysis, and automated extraction of stereotyped (e.g., lip-smacking) and subtle (e.g., soft left turn) facial movements. PrimateFace provides a standardized platform for facial phenotyping across the primate order, empowering data-driven studies that advance the health and well-being of human and non-human primates. All models, notebooks, and data can be found at github.com/KordingLab/PrimateFace.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Automatic mapping of multiplexed social receptive fields by deep learning and GPU-accelerated 3D videography 96%
- Functional maps of the primate cortex revealed by through-skull wide-field optical imaging 95%
- NiCo Identifies Extrinsic Drivers of Cell State Modulation by Niche Covariation Analysis 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.