Back

Diversification and divergence in Myioborus warblers: insights into evolutionary relationships and plumage genetics

Arias, L. C.; Bennett, K. F. P.; Campagna, L.; Wood, A. W.; Bonaccorso, E.; Cuervo, A. M.; Cadena, C. D.; Lovette, I. J.; Toews, D. P. L.

2025-08-15 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.08.12.669906 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genomic data can provide valuable insights into the evolutionary history of rapidly diversifying groups and the genetic basis of phenotypic differences among lineages. We used whole-genome sequencing of the warbler genus Myioborus to investigate dynamics of its recent diversification in Neotropical mountains. We found that mitochondrial and UCE phylogenies are mostly, but not fully, concordant, and we found phylogenetic support for a pattern of north-to-south and low-to-high elevation colonization in the genus. Within the ornatus-melanocephalus complex, which showed topological incongruence between our phylogenies, we found that genetic structure generally coincides with geographic variation in plumage, although three subspecies with striking plumage differences exhibit low mitochondrial divergence. The hybridizing taxa M. o. chrysops and M. m. bairdi show very shallow genomic differentiation, with marked peaks of divergence. Most of these are shared with other parulid warbler pairs, pointing to broad genomic features, like recombination rate, as the processes shaping these regions. However, other highly differentiated regions were unique to Myioborus, including one containing the gene CCDC91, which is associated with melanin-based plumage differences in several other birds. Lastly, we found higher levels of differentiation on the Z chromosome relative to autosomes, including two putative chromosomal inversions. Together, these results highlight the interplay of deep ancestral divergence, recent hybridization, and shared genomic architecture in shaping the evolution of phenotypic and genomic diversity within Myioborus.

Published in Evolution (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.