Back

Fine needle aspiration biopsy of breast specimens effectively harvests cells for patient-derived organoids modeling breast ductal carcinoma in situ

Ye, J.; Goldhammer, N.; Vohra, P.; Warhadpande, S.; De Castro, G. C.; Maldonado Rodas, C.; Moasser, M. M.; Ramalingam, K.; Abe, S.; Alvarado, M.; Ewing, C.; Goodwin, K.; Mukhtar, R.; Wong, J.; Esserman, L.; Balassanian, R.; Rosenbluth, J. M.

2025-08-13 cell biology
10.1101/2025.08.12.669895 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPatient-derived organoids (PDOs) generated from benign breast tissue and breast carcinomas have successfully recapitulated their respective in vivo counterparts. PDOs model tumorigenesis and allow for screening of novel therapeutics personalized to individual patients. However, acquiring cells to generate PDOs is cumbersome. We demonstrate the feasibility of fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) for harvesting cells for PDOs modeling ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). MethodsSurgical specimens from patients with biopsy-proven DCIS were used for this study. Core needle biopsy (CNB) was performed on fresh specimens in the operating room, and tissue was mechanically dissociated before culture in basement membrane extract (BME) and organoid medium to generate PDOs. FNAB was performed in the gross room on fresh specimens, and the remaining aspirate was similarly submitted for PDO culture. ResultsPDOs were successfully generated in 15/18 specimens obtained by CNB and 7/11 specimens obtained by FNAB. The average time to initial organoid growth was 4 days for FNAB specimens compared to 19.3 days for CNB specimens. Tumor cells were seen on 7/11 FNAB smears and 16/18 CNB touch preps. Immunofluorescence staining confirmed the presence of both luminal and myoepithelial cells in derived PDOs. ConclusionsFNAB effectively obtains cells for PDOs modeling DCIS. CNB after mincing yielded PDOs with a high success rate, but they were slow to establish. Notably, the time to organoid growth was significantly shorter for FNAB specimens. Thus, FNAB offers an efficient alternative for breast PDO culture and can reduce the time and resources spent on generating PDO cultures.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.1%
2
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
3
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.8%
5
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.1%
6
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
8
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
9
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
10
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
11
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
14
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
16
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
25
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
26
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%