Back

High-resolution three-dimensional mapping of eelgrass (Zostera marina) habitat and blue carbon using drone-borne LiDAR

Lavin, C. P.; Buls, T.; Gundersen, H.; Kvile, K. O.; Odegaard, O. T.; Poulsen, R. N.; Hancke, K.

2025-08-15 ecology
10.1101/2025.08.12.669815 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The accessibility of flying drones (Unoccupied Aerial Vehicles) presents scientists and managers with reproducible and cost-effective methods to monitor submerged aquatic vegetation. In particular, drone-borne topobathymetric LiDAR provides high-resolution (cm-scale), three-dimensional information about the geometry and structure of surveyed areas, allowing for quantification of vegetation volume in addition to bathymetry. For habitat-forming submerged and intertidal vegetation like seagrass, this information can advance research regarding the structure and patchiness of canopies in relation to biodiversity, blue carbon storage, and hydrodynamic processes. Here, we report how drone-borne LiDAR can be used to estimate the habitat volume of eelgrass (Zostera marina) within a sheltered bay in south-eastern Norway. After classifying LiDAR points using a Random Forest model, we created a Digital Terrain Model of the sea floor and a Digital Surface Model of the eelgrass canopy. From these models, we estimated eelgrass canopy volume to range between 862 and 1099 m3 across the small study area. From the volume, we estimated above-ground carbon storage in living eelgrass tissue to range between 96 and 122 kg. To our knowledge, this is the first study to utilise drone-borne LiDAR to quantify the volume and carbon-storage potential of a marine habitat-forming species like eelgrass, thereby demonstrating the potential of drone-borne LiDAR as an efficient tool to provide reproducible and high-resolution data for submerged aquatic habitats, including seagrass meadows.

Published in Remote Sensing (predicted rank #3) · training set

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.