Back

Pathophysiology of voluntary motor commands at the level of the spinal motoneuron in patients with multiple sclerosis

McPherson, L. M.; Lohse, K.; Simon, S.; Beauchamp, J. A.; Negro, F.; Naismith, R. T.; Cross, A. H.

2025-08-13 neurology
10.1101/2025.08.12.25333527 medRxiv
Show abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a progressive inflammatory neurodegenerative disease that degrades neural transmission between the brain and spinal -motoneurons. These voluntary motor commands contain excitatory, inhibitory, and neuromodulatory components that must be appropriately balanced for skilled motor control. Unlike other clinical populations, in MS we have no knowledge about how voluntary motor commands are disrupted. MS is a clinically heterogeneous population, with sensorimotor impairments that vary widely and unpredictably across patients. Our overall scientific hypothesis is that the voluntary motor command in the MS population varies accordingly, with multiple "phenotypes" evident. Here, we explore this idea by identifying pathological aspects of the voluntary motor command in 59 participants with MS with a range of sensorimotor symptoms and disability, compared with 38 age-/sex-matched controls. We recorded motor unit discharge from the tibialis anterior and soleus muscles during isometric dorsiflexion/plantarflexion contractions. We then calculated geometric and temporal features in their firing patterns to characterize their excitatory, inhibitory, and neuromodulatory inputs according to a recently developed "reverse engineering" paradigm. MS values for many of our parameters were highly variable, with some participants with abnormally values and others with abnormally low values. In addition to this variability, MS group means for most parameters reflecting the balance of neuromodulation and inhibition were significantly lower than those of controls. These initial findings support the idea that there may be different phenotypes of voluntary motor command pathology among patients with MS, indicating the potential need to personalize the selection of mechanistically targeted rehabilitation therapies.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.