Precision therapy with ampreloxetine for neurogenic orthostatic hypotension in multiple system atrophy
Freeman, R.; Kaufmann, H.; Biaggioni, I.; Iodice, V.; Jordan, J.; Vickery, R.; Geurin, T.; Kmiecik, M. J.; Norcliffe-Kaufmann, L.
Show abstract
ObjectiveA pre-specified subgroup analysis of ampreloxetine (oral, 10 mg/once-per-day) for neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH) in patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA). BackgroundThe degeneration of the central autonomic network underlies neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH) in patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA), which leads to disability. The pathology shows relative sparing of the peripheral autonomic neurons. Despite adherence to treatment many patients remain symptomatic. Ampreloxetine is a novel, long-acting, selective, norepinephrine re-uptake inhibitor that allows for once daily dosing to precisely target residual peripheral autonomic neurons. Based on the hypothesis that MSA patients would be most responsive to ampreloxetine, we performed a pre-specified subgroup analysis of the MSA cohort. MethodsREDWOOD (NCT03829657) was an IRB-approved, phase 3, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal trial conducted at 76 international clinics. The trial had a 16-week open-label period with responders continuing into a double-blind 1:1 randomized 6-week withdrawal phase. Outcome measures included symptom burden captured on the 10-item OH-Questionnaire (OHQ), blood pressures, and catecholamine assays. The pre-specified subgroup analysis included all randomly assigned MSA patients. ResultsIn total, 73 MSA patients entered the program. Forty (61%) met enrichment criteria and went on to randomize. At the end of the open-label phase, their average OHQ symptom assessment (OHSA) composite score improved by 2.6 points from the pre-treatment baseline values. At week 6 of randomization, symptoms remained stable in the ampreloxetine group but worsened on placebo (mean difference OHSA composite score: -1.6 points; p=0.0056). Walking for a short time showed similar changes favoring ampreloxetine (-2.0 points; p=0.0147). Standing 3-minute blood pressure remained unchanged from open-label in the ampreloxetine group (systolic: 5.6{+/-}4.14; diastolic: 3.7{+/-}2.89 (SE) mmHg), but dropped in the group withdrawn to placebo (systolic: -10.0{+/-}4.45, diastolic -6.0{+/-}3.09 mmHg). The catecholamine profile showed target engagement of norepinephrine transporter-inhibition by ampreloxetine. There were no safety concerns nor observed increases in supine blood pressure. ConclusionIf the ongoing phase 3 study confirms the safety and efficacy, ampreloxetine would be the first example of a precision medicine approach for the treatment of nOH in MSA.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- α4β2 * Nicotinic Cholinergic Receptor Target Engagement in Parkinson Disease Gait-Balance Disorders 94%
- Development of Parkinson’s disease and its relationship with incidentally-discovered white matter disease and covert brain infarction in a real world cohort 92%
- Propranolol reduces Parkinson’s tremor and inhibits tremor-related activity in the motor cortex: a placebo-controlled crossover trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Disease-Modifying, Neuroprotective Effect of N-acetyl-L-leucine in Adult and Pediatric Patients with Niemann–Pick disease type C 90%
- The timing and impact of psychiatric, cognitive and motor abnormalities in Huntington's disease 89%
- Frequency of neurological manifestations in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 350 studies 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of GLP-1RA exenatide on Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Randomised Clinical Trial 92%
- Disrupted reward processing in Parkinson’s Disease and its relationship with dopamine state and neuropsychiatric syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis 91%
- Huntington's disease phenocopy syndromes revisited: a clinical comparison and next-generation sequencing exploration 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.