Tactile Pressure Evokes a Biphasic BOLD Response in Ipsilateral Primary Somatosensory Cortex
Feldbush, A. C.; Kalantaryardebily, N.; Reddy, N. A.; Faubion-Trejo, R.; Soldate, J.; Lisinski, J.; Bright, M. G.; Gurari, N.; LaConte, S. M.
Show abstract
Tactile perception is fundamental to how we engage with and interpret our surroundings. While the contralateral primary somatosensory cortex (S1) is thought to be generally responsible for processing tactile information, simultaneous responses in the ipsi-lateral hemisphere have been observed. This work aims to characterize the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) response pattern of ipsilateral S1 to unilateral tactile stimuli. In this study, tactile stimuli were applied using a custom pneumatically actuated stimulator designed and built in house (KalantaryArdebily et al., 2024). Three stimulus force levels were applied in an event-related design. As expected we observed an apparent difference in BOLD responses between the contralateral and ipsilateral hemispheres. We found differing response patterns between the Brodmanns areas (BA) within ipsilateral S1. Ipsilateral BA2 had a positive BOLD response similar to that of the contralateral hemisphere. In contrast, ipsilateral BA1 and BA3b appeared to have a biphasic response. That is, those regions had an initial negative response, followed by a secondary positive one. Using multi-echo analysis, we verified that this biphasic response pattern is BOLD-related. In addition, the secondary (positive) phase was more sensitive to tactile stimulus force than the initial "negative" BOLD phase. The ipsilateral BA1 and BA3b responses support a previous hypothesis of bilateral sensory gating (Blatow et al., 2007; Chung et al., 2014; Hamalainen et al., 2000; Kastrup et al., 2008; Klingner et al., 2016; Schafer et al., 2012; Tame et al., 2015). This study extends previous research reporting negative responses in ipsilateral S1, suggesting that the response is BOLD-related, biphasic, and that the previously overlooked secondary positive phase is actually more sensitive to stimulus intensity.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Laminar CBV and BOLD response-characteristics over time and space in the human primary somatosensory cortex at 7T 97%
- Laminar multi-contrast fMRI at 7T allows differentiation of neuronal excitation and inhibition underlying positive and negative BOLD responses 96%
- Decoding of columnar-level organization across cortical depth using BOLD- and CBV-fMRI at 7 T 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Supramodal representation of the sense of body ownership in the human parieto-premotor and extrastriate cortices 94%
- Detection of threshold-level stimuli modulated by temporal predictions of the cerebellum 94%
- Transcranial Static Magnetic Stimulation Dissociates the Causal Roles of the Parietal Cortex in Spatial and Temporal Processing 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dissociating the Neural Correlates of Planning and Executing Tasks with Nested Task Sets 94%
- Large-scale functional integration, rather than functional dissociation along dorsal and ventral streams, underlies visual perception and action 93%
- Abstract neural representations of category membership beyond information coding stimulus or response 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.