Back

PU.1-driven enrichment enables microglia profiling from frozen brain tissue using the high-throughput Smart-seq3xpress method

Dostalova, D.; Abaffy, P.; Rohlova, E.; Kriska, J.; Knotek, T.; Tureckova, J.; Kirdajova, D.; Anderova, M.; Valihrach, L.

2025-08-15 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.08.11.669607 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Single-cell transcriptomics has revealed the central role of microglia in brain development, homeostasis, and disease, particularly in the context of neuroinflammation. While single-cell RNA-sequencing enables targeted microglial analysis from fresh tissue, studying these cells in cryopreserved or archival samples remains challenging due to the lack of protocols for their specific enrichment. We introduce a method for the selective isolation of microglial nuclei from fresh-frozen brain tissue using the transcription factor PU.1 as a nuclear marker. To stabilize PU.1 for reliable detection, a brief formaldehyde fixation step is applied. The protocol is fully compatible with Smart-seq3xpress, a high-sensitivity, full-length transcriptomic method offering isoform- and allele-level resolution, making the workflow scalable and cost-efficient. We benchmarked the method in a mouse model of ischemic stroke, evaluating both technical performance and its ability to capture biologically meaningful microglial states. Compared to standard single-nucleus protocols, our approach yielded higher gene and UMI counts and a greater proportion of coding reads. Transcriptomic profiles closely matched those from whole-cell RNA-sequencing including the detection of activation markers and diverse microglial subpopulations. This approach addresses key limitations of single-nucleus RNA - sequencing and opens new possibilities for studying microglial states in cryopreserved and archival brain tissue, broadening access to cellular insights in both basic and translational research.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.