Back

IFNG-producing self-reactive CD4+ T cells drive autoimmune adrenalitis in a mouse model of Addison's disease

Andreyeva, A.; Michalik, J.; Niederlova, V.; Cimermanova, V.; Drobek, A.; Sedlacek, R.; Prochazka, J.; Labaj, J.; Fedosieieva, O.; Kanczkowski, W.; Draber, P.; Stepanek, O.; Neuwirth, A.

2025-08-11 immunology
10.1101/2025.08.11.669305 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Autoimmune Addisons disease (AD) is a rare, life-threatening endocrine disorder caused by immune-mediated destruction of the adrenal cortex. AD frequently occurs in patients with autoimmune polyglandular syndrome type 1, a monogenic autoimmune syndrome caused by AIRE deficiency. The pathogenesis of AD remains poorly understood due to the lack of suitable animal models. Here, we established a mouse model of Experimental Autoimmune Adrenalitis by targeting the adrenal self-antigen CYP11A1. Immunization with CYP11A1-derived peptides elicited clonal expansion of CYP11A1-specific T-cell clones and the adrenal infiltration of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and myeloid cells. Inflammation progressed to granulomatous lesions and culminated in adrenal insufficiency in AIRE-deficient mice with impaired central tolerance. A modification of the model based an adoptive transfer of polyclonal CYP11A1-stimulated CD4+ T cells into T-cell deficient hosts accelerated adrenal dysfunction. In contrast, IFNG-deficient CD4+ T cells induced only mild granulomatous inflammation and failed to cause overt adrenal insufficiency. These findings established a tractable mouse model for dissecting AD pathogenesis and identified CD4+ T cell-derived IFNG as a key effector of adrenal autoimmunity, providing a preclinical platform for testing targeted immunotherapies.

Published in JCI Insight (predicted rank #10) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.