Consistent microorganisms respond during aerobic thaw of Alaskan permafrost soils
O'Brien, J. M.; Blais, N. D.; Holland-Moritz, H.; Shek, K. L.; Douglas, T. A.; Barbato, R. A.; Ernakovich, J. G.
Show abstract
Arctic systems are experiencing warming at four times the rate of the global average, causing permafrost--permanently frozen soil, ice, organic matter, and bedrock--to thaw. Permafrost thaw exposes previously unavailable soil carbon and nutrients to decomposition--a process mediated by microbes--which releases greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane into the atmosphere. While it is well-established that thaw alters the composition and function of the permafrost microbiome, patterns revealing common responses to thaw across different permafrost soil types have not yet emerged. Here, we address how permafrost thaw impacts microbiome diversity, alters species abundance, and contributes to carbon flux in the Arctic. We sampled peat-like, mineral, and organic-mineral permafrost from three locations in central and northern Alaska and assessed their abiotic soil properties and microbiome characteristics during a 3-month laboratory microcosm incubation. In all sites, prokaryotic biomass increased following thaw, measured as 16S rRNA gene copy number and absolute abundance. This change in biomass was positively correlated with cumulative respiration, indicating an increase in microbial activity post-thaw. We assessed the thaw response of microbial taxa across three sites, identifying taxa that significantly increased in abundance post-thaw. Common responders shared across all sites belonged to the families Beijerinckiaceae, Burkholderiaceae, Clostridiaceae, Oxalobacteraceae, Pseudomonadaceae, and Sporichthyaceae, indicating a common set of taxa that consistently respond to thaw regardless of site-specific conditions. Alpha diversity decreased with thaw across all sites, which likely reflects the increased dominance of specific thaw-responsive taxa, which may be driving post-thaw biogeochemistry and increased respiration. Taken together, we deepen the understanding of different permafrost microbiomes and their response to thaw, which has implications for the permafrost-climate feedback and allows for better predictions of how Arctic ecosystem structure and function respond to change.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Biogeographical patterns in soil bacterial communities across the Arctic region 95%
- Exploring methanogenic archaea and their thermal responses in the glacier-fed stream sediments of Rongbuk River Basin, Mt. Everest 95%
- Energetic and Environmental Constraints on the Community Structure of Benthic Microbial Mats in Lake Fryxell, Antarctica 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rhizospheric bacteria from the Atacama Desert hyper-arid core: cultured community dynamics and plant growth promotion 94%
- Abiotic treatment to common bean plants results in an altered seed microbiome. 94%
- Response of total (DNA) and metabolically active (RNA) microbial communities in Miscanthus x giganteus cultivated soil to different nitrogen fertilization rates 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Anaerobic methane oxidizing archaea offset sediment methane concentrations in Arctic thermokarst lagoons 95%
- Climate change impacts the structure and nitrogen-fixing activities of subarctic feather moss microbiomes across a precipitation gradient 94%
- Substrate availability and not thermal-acclimation controls microbial temperature sensitivity response to long term warming 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Microbial Resuscitation and Growth Rates in Deep Permafrost: Lipid Stable Isotope Probing Results from the Permafrost Research Tunnel in Fox, Alaska 97%
- Allochthonous groundwater microorganisms affect coastal seawater microbial abundance, activity and diversity 93%
- Linking the chemistry and reactivity of dissolved organic matter from low-latitude glaciers and rock glaciers 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.