Personalized, Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation for Chronic Pain
Shirvalkar, P.; Leriche, R. B.; Saal, J.; Cagle, J.; Prosky, J.; Joseph, I.; Shaughnessy, A.; Schmitgen, A.; Lin, J.; Motzkin, J. C.; Dawes, H.; Racine, C.; Seritan, A.; Sellers, K.; deHemptinne, C.; Starr, P. A.; Chang, E. F.
Show abstract
BackgroundChronic pain is a major healthcare problem associated with maladaptive brain circuit changes - many patients are unresponsive to all available therapies. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising treatment, but traditional targets have not proven consistently effective. DBS for pain may be improved by individualizing location and timing of stimulation based on real time brain measurements and patient reports. MethodsTo optimize personalized stimulation targets, we first performed a double blind, sham-controlled, intracranial EEG brain mapping trial spanning 10 hospital days, in six participants with refractory neuropathic pain syndromes. Five participants with clinically meaningful pain relief were then implanted with permanent devices capable of brain stimulation and recording. We used ambulatory electrical brain recordings to derive bespoke pain biomarkers using machine learning. Pain biomarkers were used in closedloop DBS algorithms for personalized therapy. After an open-label period, we tested the feasibility and efficacy of closed-loop DBS for pain relief against sham in a double-blind, cross-over trial. ResultsTrial intracranial testing revealed multiple brain targets among cortico-striatal-thalamocortical pathways that produced rapid pain relief across participants. We predicted individual pain metrics from both inpatient and ambulatory brain activity with high accuracy; pain biomarkers were incorporated into closed-loop DBS algorithms that also responded to sleep-wake cycles. Personalized, closed-loop DBS was superior to sham, with durability up to 3.5 years. ConclusionsPrecision-medicine DBS, with individually optimized brain stimulation targets and closed-loop delivery of stimulation in response to pain biomarkers, is a feasible strategy to treat refractory chronic pain syndromes. Trial RegistrationNCT04144972
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Flexible and Stable Cycle-by-Cycle Phase-Locked Deep Brain Stimulation System Targeting Brain Oscillations in the Management of Movement Disorders 95%
- Generating Artificial Sensations with Spinal Cord Stimulation in Primates and Rodents 93%
- Analyses of biomarkers for tremor using local field potentials recorded from deep brain stimulation electrodes in the thalamus 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Naturalistic acute pain states decoded from neural and facial dynamics 96%
- Multisensory Flicker Modulates Widespread Brain Networks and Reduces Interictal Epileptiform Discharges in Humans 94%
- Daily electric field treatment improves functional outcomes after thoracic contusion spinal cord injury in rats 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Movement-responsive deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease using a remotely optimized neural decoder 93%
- Biomimetic multi-channel microstimulation of somatosensory cortex conveys high resolution force feedback for bionic hands 92%
- Human spinal cord organoids exhibiting neural tube morphogenesis for a quantifiable drug screening system of neural tube defects 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.