Intracortical microstimulation in humans: a decade of safety and efficacy
Greenspon, C. M.; Hobbs, T. G.; Verbaarschot, C.; Alamri, A. H.; Shelchkova, N. D.; Lienkamper, R.; Ye, J.; Simpson, T. W.; Weiss, J. M.; Weir, D. M.; Harrington, D. E.; Van Driesche, A.; Satzer, D.; Valle, G.; Miller, L. E.; Hatsopoulos, N. G.; Gonzalez-Martinez, J.; Warnke, P. C.; Downey, J. E.; Boninger, M. L.; Collinger, J. L.; Gaunt, R. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundIntracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of somatosensory cortex can restore a sense of touch to people with spinal cord injury (SCI). In this early-feasibility clinical trial, we evaluate the safety, efficacy, and longevity of ICMS as there is a paucity of such long-term studies in humans. This information is crucial to the development of clinical neuromodulation devices, particularly for restoring touch, hearing, and vision. MethodsICMS was delivered to five participants with SCI who were each implanted with two Blackrock NeuroPort microelectrode arrays in the hand representation of Brodmanns Area 1. Across implant durations spanning two to ten years, we measured single-electrode detection thresholds, projected fields, quality reports, and electrode health characteristics. ICMS-related adverse events were documented throughout. ResultsOver 168 million ICMS pulses were delivered across a combined implant duration of 24 years without any serious adverse events or direct negative effects on electrode health. ICMS consistently evoked sensations localized to the hand. Rarely, sensations persisted for brief periods after stimulation offset (3-25 events across participants). ICMS detection thresholds increased slowly over time ([~]3.5 A/year), but 62{+/-}15% of the electrodes still reliably evoke tactile sensations ([~]25% decrease in functional electrodes), including 55% of the electrodes after 10 years in one participant. The quality and projected field coverage of ICMS-evoked sensations were both consistent. ConclusionsDelivering ICMS to somatosensory cortex was safe and reliable, consistently evoking informative somatosensory percepts as long as 10 years, demonstrating the clinical promise of ICMS for sensory restoration. (Funded by NIH; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01894802).
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Flexible and Stable Cycle-by-Cycle Phase-Locked Deep Brain Stimulation System Targeting Brain Oscillations in the Management of Movement Disorders 95%
- Transcranial electric stimulation modulates firing rate at clinically relevant intensities 95%
- Parameter optimisation for mitigating somatosensory confounds during transcranial ultrasonic stimulation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Daily electric field treatment improves functional outcomes after thoracic contusion spinal cord injury in rats 96%
- Ultraconformable cuff implants for long-term bidirectional interfacing of peripheral nerves at sub-nerve resolutions 95%
- Multisensory Flicker Modulates Widespread Brain Networks and Reduces Interictal Epileptiform Discharges in Humans 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Biomimetic multi-channel microstimulation of somatosensory cortex conveys high resolution force feedback for bionic hands 94%
- Movement-responsive deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease using a remotely optimized neural decoder 92%
- Wireless endovascular nerve stimulation with a millimeter-sized magnetoelectric implant 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural subspaces of imagined movements in parietal cortex remain stable over several years in humans. 94%
- Towards adaptive deep brain stimulation: clinical and technical notes on a novel commercial device for chronic brain sensing 93%
- A biomimetic electrical stimulation strategy to induce asynchronous stochastic neural activity 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.