Synthetic engineering demonstrates that synergy among enhancers involves an increase in transcriptionally productive enhancer-gene contacts
Haro, E.; Iliadou, M.; Ramasamy, S.; Ealo, T.; Campa, V. M.; Pachano, T.; Oudelaar, A. M.; Rada-Iglesias, A.
Show abstract
Enhancers are non-coding cis-regulatory elements that control the expression of distally located genes in a tissue- and time-specific manner. Recent studies indicate that enhancers can differ in their underlying genetic architecture and regulatory properties. However, these different types of enhancers were previously investigated under rather variable conditions (e.g. model organism, cell type, enhancer-promoter distance, type of target promoter, etc.), thus introducing confounding factors that make it difficult to discern the distinct regulatory properties of each enhancer type. To overcome these limitations, here we generated transgenic mouse embryonic stem cells (mESC) lines in which different types of synthetic enhancers (i.e. "typical" enhancer, CTCF-associated enhancer, enhancer cluster/super-enhancer) were built upon the same "core" neural enhancer and inserted at the same distance (i.e. 100 Kb) from a typical developmental gene (i.e. Gata6). Subsequently, the mESC lines were differentiated to systematically compare the regulatory properties of the different enhancer types under identical conditions. Regarding the CTCF-associated enhancer, our data revealed that the addition of a CTCF site to the "core" enhancer increased insulation and led to the formation of a smaller contact domain, while having a rather mild effect on enhancer-promoter contact frequency and target gene expression. On the other hand, in comparison to the "core" enhancer alone, the enhancer cluster synergistically increased target gene expression and burst fraction. Importantly, we found that, in contrast to previous models, the strong regulatory activity of the enhancer cluster can not be explained by changes in enhancer-promoter contact frequency or the formation of transcriptional condensates. Instead, our data suggest that the emergent regulatory properties of enhancer clustering preferentially entail an increase in RNA Polymerase II pause release and, thus, in the fraction of enhancer-promoter contacts that are transcriptionally productive.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Complex Regulatory Landscape Involved In The Development Of External Genitals 96%
- The chromatin remodeller CHD4 regulates transcription factor binding to both prevent activation of silent enhancers and maintain active regulatory elements 96%
- Association with TFIIIC limits MYCN localization in hubs of active promoters and chromatin accumulation of non-phosphorylated RNA Polymerase II 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Cohesin-dependent and independent mechanisms support chromosomal contacts between promoters and enhancers 96%
- Transcriptional architecture and Pol II regulation at promoters, enhancers, and enhancer clusters in Canis lupus familiaris 96%
- Spt4 Facilitates the Movement of RNA Polymerase II through the +2 Nucleosomal Barrier 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancer cooperativity can compensate for loss of activity over large genomic distances 96%
- Detailed temporal dissection of an enhancer cluster reveals two distinct roles for individual elements 96%
- Single molecule occupancy patterns of transcription factors reveal determinants of cooperative binding in vivo 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.