Back

Unlocking the full potential of Oxford Nanopore reads with NOVOLoci

Dierckxsens, N.; Mansfield, M. J.; Plessy, C.; Luscombe, N. M.; Vermeesch, J. R.

2025-08-12 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.08.08.669243 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Long-read sequencing technologies and accompanying algorithms have substantially advanced genome assembly. However, there are ongoing challenges in assembling complex genomic regions, particularly those associated with genetic disorders. Moreover, assemblies of non-model organisms are often limited by the amount of DNA that can be extracted, so reducing the data modalities that can be obtained. Here, we introduce NOVOLoci, a haplotype-aware assembler capable of high-quality targeted and whole-genome assemblies, despite the relatively high error rates of Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) data. By adopting a novel seed-extension approach with iterative conflict resolution, it achieves accurate haplotype phasing, thus overcoming a critical limitation of current graph-based assemblers. Benchmarking shows that NOVOLoci consistently outperforms the four leading assembly tools across five clinically relevant genomic disorder loci by delivering accurately phased assemblies with superior contiguity and completeness, even compared with hybrid assemblers that combine PacBio and ONT sequencing reads (nearly triple the N90 value compared with Verkko hybrid). We demonstrate its broader utility in assembling the genome of a highly heterozygous non-model animal Oikopleura dioica, whose small size limits the amount of DNA available from an individual. Using data only from a single ONT flow cell, NOVOLoci assembles a phased diploid genome with high contiguity and a 32-fold increase in N50 values compared with existing methods. NOVOLocis distinct algorithmic strategy demonstrates that substantial advances in genome assembly can still be made. This development brings routine clinical diagnosis of genomic disorders and diploid assembly of non-model organisms with ONT reads a step closer to reality.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.