Back

Heartbeat-evoked responses in M/EEG: A systematic review of methods with suggestions for analysis and reporting

Steinfath, T. P.; Azanova, M.; Kapralov, N.; Loesche, T.; Enk, L.; Nikulin, V.; Villringer, A.

2025-08-12 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.08.08.668923 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Heartbeat-evoked responses (HER), as measured by electroencephalography (EEG) or magnetoencephalography (MEG), represent neural activity time-locked to heartbeats and are widely used as a marker of cardiac interoception in the study of brain-body interactions. However, HER studies report largely variable findings, at least partially due to methodological variability. To achieve consensus on HER processing and improve the reproducibility of findings, the field urgently requires a structured summary of the methods employed so far. To this end, we conducted a systematic review of 132 HER studies using non-invasive M/EEG recordings in humans. Our results reveal substantial heterogeneity across most steps of HER analysis, ranging from data acquisition and preprocessing to HER estimation and statistical approaches. The large diversity in the processing choices is accompanied by considerable proportions of unreported methodological information across reviewed studies, reaching up to 80% for key processing steps. In addition, less than 33% of studies had enough statistical power to reliably detect meta-level HER effects, while their reported spatiotemporal locations varied substantially. We provide a comprehensive reporting and quality control checklist to aid in the development of more standardized procedures, highlighting critical steps for robust HER investigations. Additionally, we share the full extracted dataset, including an interactive version, to support other researchers in answering additional specific questions they may have. We hope that these resources will improve the robustness, reproducibility, and transparency of research in the growing HER field.

Published in Psychophysiology (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

Psychophysiology · published here
77 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
18.5%
3
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
11.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
5
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
6
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.8%
8
Clinical Neurophysiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
9
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.4%
14
NeuroImage: Reports
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
96 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
16
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
18
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
Brain Topography
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Aperture Neuro
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
23
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%