Back

Genetic and Epigenetic Reprogramming of Transposable Elements Drives ecDNA-Mediated Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Mout, L.; Moreno-Rodriguez, T.; Grillo, G.; Nand, A.; Keshavarzian, T.; Bahl, S.; Kang, K.; Bootsma, M.; Minnee, E.; Zhou, S.; Burns, K. H.; Corey, E.; Nelson, P.; Dehm, S. M.; Zhao, S. G.; Zwart, W.; Feng, F.; Quigley, D.; Lupien, M.

2025-08-12 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.08.08.668693 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Extrachromosomal DNAs (ecDNAs), which replicate and segregate in a non-Mendelian manner, serve as vectors for accelerated tumor evolution. By integrating chromatin accessibility, whole-genome sequencing, and Hi-C-based genome topology data from a cohort of metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) cases, we show that epigenetically activated repeat DNA, amplified in ecDNAs, drive oncogene overexpression. Specifically, we identify a subgroup of mCRPCs (20%) characterized by clusters of accessible LINE1 repeat DNA elements flanking the androgen receptor (AR) gene. These LINE1 elements are co-amplified with AR and provide binding sites for prostate-lineage transcription factors, including AR, FOXA1 and HOXB13. Accessible LINE1 elements establish novel 3D chromatin interactions with the AR gene, forging a new regulatory plexus driving AR overexpression and confers resistance to androgen signaling inhibitors. Our findings indicate how tumor evolution is driven by the convergence of genetic and epigenetic alterations on repeat DNA, activating and amplifying them to allow oncogene overexpression. Statement of significanceWe show how tumor evolution is driven by the convergence of genetic and epigenetic alterations on repeat DNA elements, resulting in their activation as regulatory elements and co-amplification in ecDNAs with oncogenes in mCRPC.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.