Back

Time to embrace the molecular approach for respiratory pathogen screening

Rodrigues, A.; Cazelli, M. E.; Eulalio, M.; Ferreira, S.; Sousa, A.

2025-08-12 pathology
10.1101/2025.08.08.25332920 medRxiv
Show abstract

The current gold standard for clinical pathogen identification relies on a combination of culture-based methods, target-specific molecular techniques, and antigen-detection assays1. Known limitations of the first method include the requirement for viable and culturable microorganisms, while the second approach is constrained to a limited number of predefined targets. These constraints reduce their diagnostic success, as not all pathogens are culturable, easily isolated from commensal microbiota, or represented in the selected detection panels. While culture-based methods are widely recognized for their limited sensitivity, updated quantifications of their actual performance in real-world clinical settings are scarce. To address this gap, we conducted a retrospective survey of all lower respiratory tract (LRT) samples processed by either culture or target-based molecular methods over a five-year period at a Portuguese hospital centre, providing a quantitative assessment of current diagnostic performance.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
3
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.9%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.3%
6
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
7
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
8
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
9
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
10
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
11
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
13
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
14
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
15
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
16
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
18
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
19
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
21
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
22
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
23
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
24
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
25
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
26
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
27
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
28
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
29
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
30
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%