KeySDL: Sparse Dictionary Learning for Keystone Microbe Identification
Gordon, M.; Akyol, T. Y.; Amos, B. K.; Andersen, S. U.; Williams, C.
Show abstract
Identification of microbes with large impacts on their microbial communities, known as keystone microbes, is a topic of long-standing interest in microbiome research. However, many approaches to identify keystone microbes are limited by the inherent nonlinearity and state-dependence of microbial dynamics. Machine learning approaches have been applied to address these shortcomings but often require more data than is available for a given microbial system. We propose a keystone identification approach called KeySDL which reduces the amount of data required by incorporating assumptions about the type of microbial dynamics present in the experimental system. The data are modeled as originating from a Generalized Lotka-Volterra (GLV) model, an architecture commonly used to simulate microbial systems. The parameters of this model are then estimated using Sparse Dictionary Learning (SDL) Compared to existing methods, this approach allows accurate prediction of keystone microbes from small numbers of samples and provides an output interpretable as reconstructed system dynamics. We also propose a self-consistency score to help evaluate whether the assumption of GLV dynamics is reasonable for a given dataset, either through the application of KeySDL or other analysis tools validated using GLV simulation.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The stochastic logistic model with correlated carrying capacities reproduces beta-diversity metrics of microbial 97%
- Linear-regression-based algorithms can succeed at identifying microbial functional groups despite the nonlinearity of ecological function 96%
- Emergent Ecological Patterns and Modelling of Gut Microbiomes in Health and in Disease 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.