Back

Does genetic rescue disrupt local adaptation? An experimental test using thermally adapted Tribolium castaneum lines

West, G.; Pointer, M.; Nash, W.; Lewis, R.; Richardson, D. S.

2025-08-10 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.08.07.669094 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Anthropogenic drivers are restricting many species to small, genetically isolated populations. These are prone to inbreeding depression and are at an increased risk of extinction. Genetic rescue, the controlled introduction of genetic variation from another population, can alleviate inbreeding effects. A major conservation concern, restricting the use of this technique, is that such augmented gene flow may disrupt local adaptation crucial to a populations persistence. Using populations of the red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum) experimentally adapted to reproduce at higher temperatures, we assess whether genetic rescue attempts disrupt thermal adaptation. Rescuers, drawn from populations adapted to either 30{degrees}C or 38{degrees}C, were introduced into populations adapted to 38{degrees}C, which had been inbred for two generations. We recorded population productivity for three generations post-rescue, in the adapted 38{degrees}C environment. Rescuers with and without local adaptation significantly increased the productivity of recipient inbred populations but, importantly, those sharing local adaptation to reproduction at 38{degrees}C provided greater increases in productivity. For the first time, we show that co-adaptation between rescuing individuals and rescuee population maybe an essential aspect of achieving desired conservation outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.7%
2
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.4%
3
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
5
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
6
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
9
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
10
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.5%
13
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
14
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
15
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
16
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
17
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Behavioral Ecology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
19
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%
21
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
22
Ecological Monographs
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
23
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
24
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
25
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
26
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
29
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.5%
30
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%