Single Cell Multiomics Across Nine Mammals Reveals Cell Type Specific Regulatory Conservation in the Brain
Anderson, A. G.; Rogers, B. B.; Barinaga, E. A.; Loupe, J.; WaMaina, E.; Johnston, S. Q.; Limbo, H. L.; Gardner, E. A.; Moyer, A. J.; Gross, A. L.; Martin, D. R.; Thyme, S. B.; Rizzardi, L. F.; Myers, R. M.; Cooper, G. M.; Cochran, J. N.
Show abstract
Understanding the gene regulatory mechanisms underlying brain function is crucial for advancing knowledge of the genetic basis of neurologic diseases. Cis-regulatory elements (CREs) play a pivotal role in gene regulation, and their evolutionary conservation can offer valuable insights. Importantly, the function and evolution of CREs are affected not only by primary sequence, but also by the cis- and trans-regulatory context. However, comparative functional analyses across species have been limited, leaving how these regulatory landscapes evolve in the brain largely unresolved. Here, we generated single-nucleus multiomic (snRNA- and snATAC-seq) data from cortex tissue across nine mammalian species and identified candidate CREs (cCREs) in a cell type-specific manner. We developed a multidimensional framework of conservation to assess sites of shared function that integrates sequence, chromatin accessibility, and enhancer-gene associations. Using massively parallel reporter assays (MPRA) in human neural progenitor cells and neurons, we measured activity of cCREs including both conserved and human-specific regions. CRISPR interference validated conserved enhancer function, including at neurodevelopmentally important genes like FAM181B. Motif enrichment identified transcription factors distinguishing conserved versus recent cCREs. Linkage disequilibrium score regression indicated that both conserved and human-specific cCREs were enriched for neuropsychiatric GWAS risk, while neurodegenerative risk was confined to conserved elements. Our findings define functional dimensions of enhancer conservation and demonstrate how regulatory evolution shapes human brain biology and disease susceptibility.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An epigenome atlas of neural progenitors within the embryonic mouse forebrain 98%
- Projection-TAGs enable multiplex projection tracing and multi-modal profiling of projection neurons 98%
- TAD Evolutionary and functional characterization reveals diversity in mammalian TAD boundary properties and function 98%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cell type-specific gene expression dynamics during human brain maturation 98%
- Dynamic network-guided CRISPRi screen reveals CTCF loop-constrained nonlinear enhancer-gene regulatory activity in cell state transitions 98%
- DNMT3A-dependent DNA methylation is required for spermatogonial stem cells to commit to spermatogenesis 98%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancer plasticity in endometrial tumorigenesis demarcates non-coding somatic mutations and 3D-genome alterations boosting the oncogenic driver ESR1 97%
- False gene and chromosome losses affected by assembly and sequence errors 97%
- BamQuery: a proteogenomic tool for the genome-wide exploration of the immunopeptidome 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of disease-associated chromatin accessibility QTLs across immune cell types and contexts 98%
- Binding domain mutations provide insight into CTCF's relationship with chromatin and its contribution to gene regulation 97%
- Single-cell multiome of the human retina and deep learning nominate causal variants in complex eye diseases 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.