Back

Exploring T. cruzi IMPDH as a promising target through Chagas Box screening and AVN-944 inhibition

Lobo-Rojas, A.; Marchese, L.; G. Eufrasio, A.; T. D. Souza, G.; F. Catelli, M.; D. N. Faria, J.; T. Cordeiro, A.

2025-08-07 biochemistry
10.1101/2025.08.06.668849 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chagas disease, caused by Trypanosoma cruzi, remains a leading cause of heart failure in Latin America, with current treatments limited to acute-phase efficacy, significant toxicity, and emerging resistance. Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) is an essential enzyme in guanine nucleotide salvage pathway and represents a promising alternative target. Here, we combined computational screening, biochemical and cell-based phenotypic assays that support T. cruzi IMPDH (TcIMPDH) as a druggable target and identify repurposing opportunities among clinical-stage inhibitors. Using Tanimoto similarity scoring against the library of 222 Chagas Box compounds, we identified TCMDC-143376 as uniquely similar to the clinical IMPDH inhibitors Merimepodib and AVN-944. Phylogenetic analysis and multiple sequence alignment confirmed conservation of both catalytic and allosteric residues--drawn from T. foetus and T. brucei structures--within TcIMPDH. Recombinant TcIMPDH kinetics revealed Michaelis constants of 155 {micro}M for IMP and 292 {micro}M for NAD. Biochemical IC assays showed submicromolar inhibition by AVN-944 (0.20 {micro}M), (S)-Merimepodib (0.21 {micro}M), and (R)-Merimepodib (0.37 {micro}M). In H9c2 cardiomyoblasts infected with intracellular amastigotes, AVN-944 achieved the lowest EC (0.4 {micro}M) and highest selectivity index (SI > 100), outperforming benznidazole (EC = 3.0 {micro}M; SI = 13.4) and other inhibitors. Our findings support TcIMPDH as a promising alternative drug target for Chagas disease and position AVN-944 as a compelling candidate to evaluate this therapeutic strategy in animal models.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.