Back

Kinematic Dissection of Arm Paresis after Focal New M1, Old M1 and Red Nucleus Lesions in Non-Human Primates

Baines, A.; Poll, A.; Baker, A. M.; Krakauer, J. W.; Baker, S. N.

2025-08-08 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.08.06.668715 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cortical and subcortical lesions to the motor system, as often occur with stroke, typically lead to transitions through a stereotyped upper limb recovery sequence. After initial weakness and loss of dexterity, spasticity and fixed muscle coactivation patterns (synergies) appear. Early work suggested that different features arise from distinct primary motor cortex (M1) subdivisions. Here we investigated this with modern methods, using ischemic lesions of various cortical areas and electrocoagulation lesions of magnocellular red nucleus (RNm) in rhesus monkeys. Nine animals were trained on a reach and grasp task; hand kinematics were assessed with markerless tracking. The proportion of damaged cortical layer V cells in each cortical area was quantified, and corresponding kinematic effects evaluated. Reaching speed showed greater and more persistent reductions with larger lesions to the posterior part of M1 on the gyrus (Posterior Old M1 in Strick's terminology). Initial increases in trajectory variability were more consistent with greater damage within the central sulcus (New M1); these partially recovered. Lesions involving Anterior Old M1 (Area 4s in Hines' terminology) had no additive negative effects. An extensive cortical lesion, which combined New and Old M1 with pre-motor and somatosensory cortex damage did not produce a worse or more persistent deficit than lesions limited to M1, suggesting that loss of arm control arose mainly from damage to descending pathways rather than cortico-cortical interactions. Lesions of RNm led to long-lasting slowing of reach, but no increase in variability. Subsequent cortical lesions to Old M1 led to more severe effects, and worse recovery, than without the preceding RNm lesion. This suggests an important neural compensatory role for the rubrospinal tract following cortical damage in monkey, which is not available in humans where the rubrospinal tract is vestigial. None of the lesions investigated led to overt abnormal synergies. The results are consistent with known differences in descending connections from each area: New M1 has fast cortico-motoneuronal output, known to be important for fine motor control (here assessed by trajectory variability); Old M1 has cortico-reticular connections able to activate the reticulospinal tract, important for generating the high forces needed for fast movements.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.9%
2
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.7%
3
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
4
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.7%
8
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
10
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 27%
3.5%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
13
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 18%
2.7%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 28%
2.0%
15
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
16
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
17
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
20
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
21
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
22
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
23
Journal of Comparative Neurology
66 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
24
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
25
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
27
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
29
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
30
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%