Back

Miro1 Mediates Skeletal Muscle Insulin Resistance in Type 2 Diabetes

Heintz, E. C.; Dantas, W. S.; Taylor, A. L.; Zunica, E. R.; Belmont, K. P.; Mey, J. T.; Beyl, R.; Vandanmagsar, B.; Parry, H. A.; Ajayi, P.; Glancy, B.; Axelrod, C. L.; Kirwan, J. P.

2025-08-10 endocrinology
10.1101/2025.08.06.25333143 medRxiv
Show abstract

ABSTRACTImbalanced skeletal muscle mitochondrial dynamics contributed to the onset and progression of type 2 diabetes (T2D) by mechanisms that remained incompletely understood. Here, we examined the role of mitochondrial Rho GTPase 1 (Miro1), an outer mitochondrial membrane enzyme, in the regulation of skeletal muscle insulin action and glucose homeostasis in T2D. Miro1 accumulated in the skeletal muscle of mice and humans with obesity and T2D, a phenomenon driven by impaired insulin-mediated interaction between AKT and Miro1 at the outer mitochondrial membrane. To determine whether Miro1 accumulation was reversible and functionally linked to metabolic improvements, we prospectively evaluated the impact of exercise training on skeletal muscle Miro1 expression, mitochondrial function, and insulin sensitivity in patients with T2D. Patients with T2D (N=24) were randomized to 12 weeks of standard care or exercise training. At baseline and after 12 weeks, we assessed changes in whole-body metabolic and mitochondrial function. Exercise training reduced skeletal muscle Miro1 accumulation (64.3% vs. -53.2% change from baseline; p=0.001) and enhanced mitochondrial oxidative capacity (-37.7% vs. 216.3% change from baseline; p=0.005) and insulin sensitivity (-18.5% vs. 80.0% change from baseline; p=0.007). To further establish a causal role for Miro1 in glucose homeostasis, we generated muscle-specific Miro1 loss- of-function models in mice and cells. Muscle-specific deletion of Miro1 improved insulin action and oxidative capacity in both models. Taken together, these findings supported a key regulatory role for skeletal muscle Miro1 in the pathophysiology of T2D.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.