Back

A compact vector for scarless gene editing in E. coli

Ridone, P.; Baker, M. A.

2025-08-06 microbiology
10.1101/2025.08.05.668820 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Here we present pCASKD, a single-plasmid system for scarless chromosomal editing in Escherichia coli. Our plasmid pCASKD integrates CRISPR-Cas9-mediated counterselection, Lambda-Red recombineering, and temperature-sensitive plasmid curing into a 12 Kb vector to enable kilobase-scale insertions and deletions using a linear dsDNA donor and homologous recombination. Using the flagellar stator motAB locus as a model, we demonstrate that pCASKD enables efficient knock-in and knock-out edits with lower donor DNA input and reduced false positives compared with its parent, multi-plasmid system, No-SCAR. Using a single plasmid reduces transformation steps, accelerates screening, and increases the frequency of correctly edited clones. The protocol can be completed in five days, with potential for further optimization, offering a compact and efficient alternative for microbial genome engineering.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.8%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Microbial Cell Factories
○ 27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
Similar papers in this journal
3
ACS Synthetic Biology
● 287 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.7%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 27%
5.5%
Similar papers in this journal
5
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.3%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Access Microbiology
● 25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
7
Journal of Molecular Biology
○ 232 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
8
Trends in Biotechnology
○ 12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
9
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.4%
10
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
● 51 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
11
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
12
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
● 339 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
13
The CRISPR Journal
○ 39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.7%
15
Journal of Bacteriology
● 212 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
mSystems
● 394 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
PLOS Biology
● 486 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
18
mBio
● 833 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
19
Microbiology
● 65 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
20
Genome Biology
○ 637 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
21
MicrobiologyOpen
○ 24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
22
FEBS Letters
○ 47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
23
BMC Microbiology
○ 49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
24
PLOS Pathogens
● 820 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
25
mSphere
● 302 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
26
Open Biology
● 106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
PLOS Genetics
● 862 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
28
Microbial Biotechnology
○ 34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
29
Cell Reports Methods
○ 165 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
● 72 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.