Hippocampal-guided reconstruction of an event's prior temporal context
Zou, F.; Hutchinson, J. B.; Kuhl, B. A.
Show abstract
Leading theories of episodic memory argue that when events from the past are remembered, temporally-adjacent events are also reinstated ( temporal context reinstatement). However, direct evidence for temporal context reinstatement is surprisingly limited. Here, we tested for temporal context reinstatement in a human fMRI continuous recognition memory experiment in which natural scene images were repeatedly encountered. For the original encounter with each scene, we defined its temporal context as the visual content of temporally-adjacent scenes. Using voxelwise encoding models, we tested whether fMRI activity patterns evoked when a scene was re-encountered carried information about the original encounters temporal context. Indeed, we found robust temporal context reinstatement within high-level visual cortex (lateral occipitotemporal cortex; LOTC), despite the fact that reinstated content was entirely incidental to task demands. However, temporal context reinstatement only occurred when stimuli were successfully recognized, indicating that reinstatement was behaviorally-relevant, even if incidental. Finally, the strength of temporal context reinstatement in LOTC was predicted by the similarity of hippocampal activity patterns across encounters, demonstrating distinct, but complimentary, roles for the hippocampus and neocortex in reinstating temporal context information.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatial processing of limbs reveals the center-periphery bias in high level visual cortex follows a nonlinear topography 97%
- Dissociable contributions of the medial parietal cortex to recognition memory 96%
- Brief encounters with real objects modulate medial parietal but not occipitotemporal cortex 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.