Back

Study Protocol: Prognostic Factors of High Healthcare Utilization Costs Among People with Spinal Disorders Using a Spine Registry Linked to Public Healthcare Data

Feller, D.; Berg, B.; Nesse Vigdal, O.; Kjono, L. G.; Wilhelmsen, M.; Koes, B.; Grotle, M.; Chiarotto, A.

2025-08-06 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.08.05.25333009 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo identify prognostic factors associated with high spine-related healthcare costs among patients referred to secondary care for spinal disorders in Norway. Study Design and SettingThis prognostic factor study will follow the PROGnosis RESearch Strategy (PROGRESS) framework. We will utilize data from 7,877 patients included in the Norwegian Neck and Back Registry between 2016 and 2020, linked to national administrative databases, to estimate spine-related healthcare costs over a 12-month period following the index consultation. MethodsCandidate prognostic factors will include demographic, clinical, psychosocial, and work-related variables collected at baseline. Healthcare costs will be estimated using reimbursement rates from national registries and adjusted to 2022 price levels. Missing data will be handled through multiple imputation using chained equations. Associations between predictors and costs will be assessed using generalized linear models with a Gamma distribution. Continuous variables will be modeled using restricted cubic splines. All models will be adjusted for prior healthcare costs, age, gender, baseline pain intensity, disability, and other significant univariable predictors. Subgroup analyses (e.g., by pain location) and sensitivity analyses (complete-case analysis) will be conducted. ConclusionThis study will provide evidence on factors associated with high spine-related healthcare costs, aiming to inform future research and health policy.

Published in European Journal of Pain (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.