Study Protocol: Prognostic Factors of High Healthcare Utilization Costs Among People with Spinal Disorders Using a Spine Registry Linked to Public Healthcare Data
Feller, D.; Berg, B.; Nesse Vigdal, O.; Kjono, L. G.; Wilhelmsen, M.; Koes, B.; Grotle, M.; Chiarotto, A.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo identify prognostic factors associated with high spine-related healthcare costs among patients referred to secondary care for spinal disorders in Norway. Study Design and SettingThis prognostic factor study will follow the PROGnosis RESearch Strategy (PROGRESS) framework. We will utilize data from 7,877 patients included in the Norwegian Neck and Back Registry between 2016 and 2020, linked to national administrative databases, to estimate spine-related healthcare costs over a 12-month period following the index consultation. MethodsCandidate prognostic factors will include demographic, clinical, psychosocial, and work-related variables collected at baseline. Healthcare costs will be estimated using reimbursement rates from national registries and adjusted to 2022 price levels. Missing data will be handled through multiple imputation using chained equations. Associations between predictors and costs will be assessed using generalized linear models with a Gamma distribution. Continuous variables will be modeled using restricted cubic splines. All models will be adjusted for prior healthcare costs, age, gender, baseline pain intensity, disability, and other significant univariable predictors. Subgroup analyses (e.g., by pain location) and sensitivity analyses (complete-case analysis) will be conducted. ConclusionThis study will provide evidence on factors associated with high spine-related healthcare costs, aiming to inform future research and health policy.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting pain and function outcomes in people consulting with shoulder pain: The PANDA-S clinical cohort and qualitative study protocol (ISRCTN 46948079) 95%
- Clinical And Cost-Effectiveness Of A Personalised Guided Consultation Versus Usual Physiotherapy Care In People Presenting With Shoulder Pain: A Protocol For The Panda-S Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial And Process Evaluation 94%
- Distributions of Recorded Pain in Mental Health Records: A Natural Language Processing Based Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The perception of individuals with low back pain regarding reassuring information: insights based on physiotherapists messages 93%
- The economic burden of low back pain in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: a prevalence-based cost-of-illness analysis from the healthcare provider’s perspective 93%
- Can a specific biobehavioral based therapeutic education program lead to changes in pain perception and brain plasticity biomarkers in chronic pain patients? A study protocol for a randomized clinical trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Use and appropriateness of Reporting Guidelines in physical therapy research: a protocol for a meta-research study 89%
- Prospective Registration of Trials: Where we are, why, and how we could get better 88%
- Income inequality and access to advanced immunotherapy for lung cancer: the case of Durvalumab in the Netherlands 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.