Back

Integrative Proteome-Wide Structural Analysis and High-Throughput Docking Identify Broad-Spectrum Antiviral Scaffolds Against Zika, Yellow Fever, West Nile, Saint Louis Encephalitis, and Usutu Viruses

Soares, A. P.; Penteado, A. B.; Kato, R. B.; Zanotto, P. M. d. A.; Freire, C. C. d. M.; de Lima Neto, D. F.

2025-08-05 microbiology
10.1101/2025.08.04.668588 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Integrative proteome-wide virtual screening offers a powerful route to discover broad-spectrum antivirals against emerging flaviviruses, for which no approved therapeutics currently exist. Here, we address this gap by constructing homology models of all structural and nonstructural proteins from Zika, Yellow Fever, West Nile, Saint Louis Encephalitis, and Usutu viruses. We applied a standardized pipeline--combining sequence and structure based pocket prediction (Concavity), electrostatic profiling (APBS), and pharmacokinetic filtering (Lipinskis rules, ADMET)--to generate high-confidence binding sites. A focused library of 160 natural product scaffolds and repurposed antivirals was then docked exhaustively (2,000 runs per pocket) using AutoDock4/Vina, followed by clustering and ranking by binding energy. Comparative analyses (RMSD, PCA, RMSF) confirmed conserved core folds alongside virus-specific surface signatures, guiding grid definition. Of the 45 top-ranked scaffolds, several flavonoids exhibited dual-site binding to the NS5 polymerase and E glycoprotein across [≥]4 viruses, while ribavirin and sofosbuvir engaged conserved catalytic motifs in NS3/NS5, highlighting opportunities for combination strategies. Lead compounds such as myricetin (Kd {approx} 1.9 {micro}M), temoporfin (Kd {approx} 1.2 nM), and aurintricarboxylic acid (Kd {approx} 1.9 {micro}M) demonstrated favorable multitarget profiles. This integrative framework prioritizes robust candidates for experimental validation and optimization of panflaviviral therapeutics.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.