Back

A synaptic mechanism for encoding the learned value of action-derived safety

Macdonald, E. E.; Ma, J.; Liu, D.; Yu, K.; Authement, M. E.; Leng, Y.; Goldbach, H. C.; Averbeck, B. B.; Alvarez, V. A.; Penzo, M. A.

2025-08-04 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.08.04.668532 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Motivated behavior is often framed in terms of biologically grounded outcomes, such as food or threat. Yet many motivated actions, like the pursuit of safety or agency, depend on outcomes that lack explicit sensory value and must instead be inferred from experience. Here, we identify a thalamostriatal circuit mechanism by which such internally constructed outcomes acquire motivational value. In mice performing an active avoidance task, neurons in the paraventricular thalamus (PVT) projecting to the nucleus accumbens (NAc) develop a safety-encoding signal that emerges following successful avoidance. This signal is experience-dependent and value-sensitive, diminishing upon devaluation of the instrumental contingency. Selective silencing of the PVT[->]NAc projection at safety onset disrupts avoidance persistence without impairing action-outcome learning, as confirmed by computational modeling of value updating based on prediction error. Mechanistically, PVT input recruits cholinergic interneurons (CINs) to modulate dopamine release and this influence depends on synaptic potentiation mediated by GluA2-lacking AMPA receptor insertion at PVT-CIN synapses. Disrupting this plasticity selectively impairs the avoidance response by blunting the motivational value of safety without affecting acquisition. These findings reveal how thalamic circuits assign value to abstract, internal outcomes, providing a framework for understanding how goals like safety are inferred, stabilized, and rendered behaviorally effective.

Published in Nature Communications (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.