Emotional and Linguistic Features Predict Prefrontal Functional Connectivity during Ongoing Dialogues: An fNIRS Investigation
Carollo, A.; Bizzego, A.; Lim, M.; Stella, M.; Doderovic, G.; Esposito, G.
Show abstract
Identifying the neural bases of language has been a central focus in neuro-science since the pioneering case studies by Broca and Wernicke. Contemporary research has moved beyond classical modular models to conceptualize language as supported by a distributed network of anatomically and functionally interconnected brain regions. Yet, few studies have explored how these networks operate during spontaneous, real-life speech, limiting our understanding of language in natural contexts. In this study, we collected data from 84 individuals engaged in live conversations. Participants prefrontal brain activity was recorded using functional near-infrared spectroscopy hyperscanning, and functional connectivity was quantified via wavelet transform coherence. Dialogues were manually transcribed, and computational methods were applied to extract emotional and semantic/syntactic features from the speech data. Using linear mixed-effects models, we found that emotional content significantly predicted prefrontal functional connectivity [Formula] Among all emotional predictors, expressed anger was the most robust: higher anger levels were associated with reduced connectivity between the left middle frontal gyrus and the right inferior frontal gyrus [Formula]. While other semantic and syntactic features did not predict overall connectivity, degree assortativity--an index of linguistic structure--was negatively associated with connectivity between the superior frontal gyri and the left inferior frontal gyrus [Formula]. These findings highlight how both affective and structural properties of speech modulate prefrontal connectivity during real-life interaction. More broadly, this work demonstrates the potential of integrating computational linguistics with social neuroscience to uncover the neural mechanisms of real-life social interactions.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multidimensional neural representations of social features during movie viewing 96%
- Heroes and villains: opposing narrative roles engage neural synchronization in the lateral inferior frontal gyrus 95%
- Statistical Pattern Recognition Reveals Shared Neural Signatures for Displaying and Recognizing Specific Facial Expressions 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Technologically-Assisted Communication Attenuates Inter-Brain Synchrony 96%
- Enhanced Mirror Neuron Network Activity and Effective Connectivity during Live Interaction Among Female Subjects 96%
- Act Natural: Functional Connectivity from Naturalistic Stimuli fMRI Outperforms Resting-State in Predicting Brain Activity 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Personalized Neuroimaging Reveals the Impact of Children's Interests on Language Processing in the Brain 96%
- Evidence for a Compensatory Relationship between Left- and Right-Lateralized Brain Networks 95%
- Individual connectivity-based parcellations reflect functional properties of human auditory cortex 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The "two-brain" approach reveals the positive role of task-deactivated default mode network in narrative speech comprehension 96%
- Similar neural networks respond to coherence during comprehension and production of discourse 95%
- Alone Again: Altered Activation in the Observation Execution System during Synchronization in High Loneliness Individuals 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A new fMRI localizer for preoperative language mapping using a sentence completion task: Validity, choice of baseline condition, and test-retest reliability 95%
- Stereoscopic Rendering in a Head Mounted Display Elicits Higher Functional Connectivity During Virtual Reality 94%
- Disrupted information flow in resting-state in adolescents with sports related concussion 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.