Back

Metabolically robust autoluminescent reporters

Morozov, V. V.; Balakireva, A. V.; Gao, F.; Fleiss, A.; Mishina, N. M.; Perfilov, M. M.; Mitiouchkina, T. Y.; Gorbachev, D. A.; Wood, K. V.; Yampolsky, I. V.; Sarkisyan, K. S.; Mishin, A. S.

2025-08-05 plant biology
10.1101/2025.08.04.668150 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Self-sustained luminescence can be engineered in non-luminous organisms by integrating luciferin biosynthesis pathways with the hosts metabolism. When conditionally expressed, such pathways enable non-invasive monitoring of virtually any transcriptional event, providing a wide dynamic range and high resolution. However, because light emission depends on substrate availability within the cell, autoluminescence reporters are inherently non-quantitative: signal intensity reflects both gene expression and cellular metabolism. Here, we present an approach that disentangles the contributions of gene expression and metabolism, rendering autoluminescence signals robust against metabolic perturbations. By co-expressing an engineered reference luciferase variant that uses the same substrate but emits light at a different wavelength, and monitoring the resulting colour ratio, we dramatically reduce signal variation, enabling quantitative physiological imaging amid changing metabolic activity. Our strategy is applicable across known autoluminescence pathways from bacteria and fungi.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Methods
○ 385 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
23.2%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 6%
22.7%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Nature Plants
○ 94 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
4
Nature Biotechnology
○ 172 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.5%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 18%
2.9%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Nature Chemical Biology
○ 119 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
7
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.5%
8
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.5%
9
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 16%
2.2%
10
Plant Biotechnology Journal
○ 64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
11
ACS Synthetic Biology
● 287 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
12
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.2%
13
Cell Reports Methods
○ 165 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
14
Journal of the American Chemical Society
● 217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
○ 93 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
The Plant Cell
◐ 161 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
The EMBO Journal
○ 309 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
18
Molecular Systems Biology
○ 162 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Current Biology
○ 665 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
20
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.5%
21
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.5%
22
New Phytologist
○ 346 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.