Back

Genomic insights into the local adaptation of spontaneously occurring populations of olive trees (Olea europaea ssp. europaea var. sylvestris) in the Mediterranean Basin

Zunino, L.; Sarah, G.; Rocchetti, L.; Rhone, B.; Soriano, A.; Droc, G.; Mournet, P.; El Bakkali, A.; Costes, E.; Khadari, B.; Cubry, P.

2025-08-04 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.08.04.668140 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Living organisms are increasingly threatened by significant environmental changes, primarily driven by human-induced global alterations. Understanding and forecasting species adaptive responses to these environmental changes is therefore crucial for enhancing conservation efforts. In the Mediterranean Basin (MB), the average temperature is rising at a rate 20% faster than the global average, placing regional biodiversity at heightened risk. The study of local adaptation is thus particularly relevant. In the western MB, spontaneously occurring olive populations consist of both wild olives and admixed resulting of crop-to-wild gene flow. The wild is likely harbouring adaptive genetic variation shaped by local environmental pressures. In this study, we analysed target genomic sequencing data from spontaneously occurring populations (comprising both wild and admixed trees) as well as cultivated olive trees. We performed selective sweep and GEA analyses in wild olives to identify genomic regions associated with environmental variables. Our findings identified signatures of adaptation particularly associated with precipitation and temperature. Notably, admixed individuals retained many wild candidate SNPs in their genomes suggesting that they might retain a certain level of adaptation to their local environment. Those results are in line with recent studies suggesting hybrids could adapt more rapidly to novel environments than their parental populations. Key-words: Local adaptation, selective sweep detection, crop-to-wild gene flow, Olea europaea L., population genomics, genome-environment association

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
15.2%
3
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
4
BMC Ecology and Evolution
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.8%
6
Heredity
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
7
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
8
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.7%
9
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
12
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
14
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
15
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.1%
16
Horticulture Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
17
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
20
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
21
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.8%
22
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%