Interpreting the Effects of DNA Polymerase Variants at the Structural Level
Arnaudi, M.; Krzesinska, K.; Beltrame, L.; Tiberti, M.; Nilbert, M.; Rohlin, A.; Papaleo, E.
Show abstract
Genetic variants in the DNA polymerase enzymes POLE and POLD1 can affect protein function by altering stability, catalysis, DNA binding, and interactions with other biomolecules. Understanding the structural basis of these variants is important for a comprehensive interpretation of variant impact. In this study, we used MAVISp, a modular structure-based framework, and molecular dynamics simulations to analyze over 60,000 missense variants of POLE and POLD1. By integrating results from changes in folding and binding free energies, local alterations in the proximity of the active or phosphorylation sites, we provided a detailed structural interpretation of variants reported across various databases, including ClinVar, COSMIC, and cBioPortal. Moreover, we predicted the functional consequences of variants not found yet in disease-related databases, thereby creating a comprehensive catalogue for future studies. Of note, our approach enabled us to classify 364 Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS) as PP3 evidence and 323 as BP4 evidence, in accordance with the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines. Additionally, we identified a group of variants that could alter the native orientation of the residues within the catalytic site of the exonuclease domain, such as POLE variants P297S and P436R. Finally, we identified a group of variants predicted to affect DNA-binding affinity and rationalized their effects in terms of different energetic contributions and structural features. Collectively, our results not only advance our understanding of protein variant effects in POLE and POLD1 at the structural level but also support future studies aimed at variant classification, variant prioritization for experimental studies, and functional interpretation across diverse biological contexts.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of synonymous corrections by the BE-FF computational tool expands the targeting scope of base editing 94%
- Genetic variations in G-Quadruplex forming sequences affect the transcription of human disease-related genes 93%
- SomaMutDB 2.0: A comprehensive database for exploring somatic mutations and their functional impact in normal human tissues 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mapping the Constrained Coding Regions in the human genome to their corresponding proteins 96%
- A new web resource to predict the impact of missense variants at protein interfaces using 3D structural data: Missense3D-PPI 94%
- Missense variants reveal functional insights into the human ARID family of gene regulators 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mutation severity spectrum of rare alleles in the human genome is predictive of disease type 95%
- Dynamic coupling of residues within proteins as a mechanistic foundation of many enigmatic pathogenic missense variants 95%
- Large scale analyses of genotype-phenotype relationships of glycine decarboxylase mutations and neurological disease severity. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Proteome-scale prediction of molecular mechanisms underlying dominant genetic diseases 95%
- Computational investigation of missense somatic mutations in cancer and potential links to pH-dependence and proteostasis 94%
- Discovery of human ACE2 variants with altered recognition by the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Multi-Layered Computational Structural Genomics Approach Enhances Domain-Specific Interpretation of Kleefstra Syndrome Variants in EHMT1 94%
- Structural Insight into the Function of Human Peptidyl Arginine Deiminase 6 94%
- Evolutionary progression of collective mutations in Omicron sub-lineages towards efficient RBD-hACE2: allosteric communications between and within viral and human proteins 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.