Back

Poor R-Wave Progression and Long-Term Outcomes in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

de Alencar, J. N.; Felicioni, S. P.; Marchi, M. F. N. D.

2025-08-06 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.08.04.25332992 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPoor R-wave progression (PRWP) on the 12-lead electrocardiogram has been linked to adverse outcomes. Its prognostic value in a contemporary, multi-ethnic population without baseline coronary artery disease (CAD) is unclear. MethodsWe analyzed 6,323 adults (mean age 61.9{+/-}10.2 years; 54% women) from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis after excluding pre-excitation, major conduction disease, Q-wave infarction, and missing covariates. PRWP was defined as R-wave amplitude [≤]3 mm in V3 with RV3>RV2 and was present in 202 participants (3.2%). Outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) death, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: nonfatal myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or stroke). Cox models adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, hypertension, and diabetes. ResultsOver a median 14.1 years (IQR, 13.5-14.7), 1,138 deaths, 256 CV deaths, and 515 MACE occurred. Among PRWP participants, there were 52 deaths (25.7%), 8 CV deaths (4.0%), and 16 MACE (7.9%). In prespecified models, PRWP was not associated with CV death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87; 95% CI, 0.43-1.76; P=0.690) or MACE (HR 0.94; 95% CI, 0.57-1.54; P=0.796) and showed a borderline association with all-cause mortality (HR 1.31; 95% CI, 0.99-1.73; P=0.059), driven by non-CV deaths. Adjustment for smoking and emphysema attenuated estimates (all-cause HR 1.19; 95% CI, 0.90-1.58; P=0.229). A PRWPxsex interaction was significant for MACE (likelihood-ratio test P=0.002), driven by higher stroke incidence in women; interactions by race/ethnicity were not significant. ConclusionsIn a large, CAD-free, multi-ethnic cohort, isolated PRWP was uncommon and did not confer independent risk for CV death or MACE over 14 years. The borderline excess in all-cause mortality was non-CV and diminished after accounting for smoking and emphysema.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.