Back

Alpha-Beta oscillations implement inhibition of the ventral attention network during an attention task

ferez, m.; Luther, L.; Bonnefond, M.

2025-08-03 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.08.03.668152 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Selective attention is a crucial mechanism that allows us to focus on relevant information while ignoring irrelevant information. Although extensive literature has proposed that alpha oscillations (7-14 Hz) suppress distractor processing, recent studies have questioned this role. In this magnetoencephalography (MEG) study, we used a modified Stroop task to investigate whether (1) alpha oscillations are associated with functional inhibition in higher-order visual regions and the ventral attention network (VAN), and (2) alpha phase adjusts in anticipation of relevant and irrelevant stimuli. We found no significant increase in pre-stimulus alpha power or phase adjustment over higher-order visual regions in the attend-color condition, consistent with the absence of a behavioral Stroop effect. However, we observed elevated alpha-beta power (10-20 Hz) in the VAN during both attend-color and attend-word conditions compared to control conditions, occurring before stimulus onset. Higher alpha-beta power in the right temporo-parietal junction correlated with faster reaction times, suggesting that inhibition of this network region facilitates task performance. This alpha-beta modulation in the VAN may represent a general mechanism for resisting distraction, preventing attentional capture by irrelevant information regardless of task condition. Additionally, we found enhanced theta power (4 Hz) over the VAN and left medial frontal gyrus (part of the cognitive control network) in both experimental conditions. Theta power correlated with improved reaction times across these regions. Furthermore, theta activity in the left medial frontal gyrus synchronized with VAN nodes, potentially indicating cross-network interaction between cognitive control and attention systems.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.