Back

Beyond Guidelines: Stakeholders experiences and implementation of a new model for antenatal care in Kavre district, Nepal

KC, S.; Shakya, R.; Shrestha, A.; Shrestha, A.; Radovich, E.

2025-08-06 public and global health
10.1101/2025.08.03.25332922 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIn 2016, WHO updated its antenatal care (ANC) guidelines, increasing the minimum number of ANC visits from four to eight and recommending practices for those visits. The new ANC model spoke to the idea of more active connection between pregnant women and to enhance the quality and experience of ANC. Though the new ANC model was adopted in Nepal in 2020, little research has examined how the guidelines have been implemented. This study aims to explore the perspectives of pregnant women, ANC providers and local policymakers on the rollout of the new 8+ visit ANC model and identify implementation gaps between policy and the experience on the ground. MethodsWe conducted a convergent parallel mixed-method study involving semi-structured facility observations of ANC processes over the course of 2-3 days and key informant interviews with pregnant women, healthcare providers and local policymakers. We purposively selected six primary care level health facilities providing ANC in three municipalities in Kavre district, Nepal and conducted eight interviews with pregnant women, seven interviews with providers and three interviews with local policymakers. The interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim; facility observations were documented via checklists and in field notes prepared after each observation. ResultsThe new ANC model was perceived primarily as an increase in number of visits for the purpose of documentation. While orientations were offered on the new ANC schedule, providers reported having no orientation on content of ANC visits. There was low awareness among pregnant women about the changes in the ANC model, but women noticed more ANC appointments compared to their previous pregnancies. Pregnant women highlighted difficulty with access to health facilities, including the time and financial constraints, long waiting periods in the referred sites and physiological challenges as major challenges in adhering to increased visits. ConclusionsThe emphasis on quantity over quality may undermine the intended benefits of the new ANC model. There is little understanding of how the visits should be used to deliver all the recommended content of ANC. Materials to enhance understanding of intended benefits of the new ANC model would help ANC providers in health facilities to improve ANC practices. It is essential to prioritize person-centered health care during pregnancy to ensure a positive pregnancy experience. It is essential to have efforts from all stakeholders for successful implementation of the new ANC model. Funding sourceThe study was funded by an unrestricted donation to LSHTM by Reckitt. The funder had no role in the design of the study. Conflict of InterestThe study team declares no conflict of interest.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.