Antenatal Education for Labour and Postpartum Pain: A Scoping Review of Content, Approaches, and Gaps
Sloyan, E. J.; Leddy, E.; Clark, C.; Dufour, S.; Harper, R.; Elma, O.
Show abstract
BackgroundPain management during labour and the postpartum period is a critical aspect of maternal care, yet many individuals face challenges in obtaining and implementing effective strategies. Antenatal education programmes play a key role in preparing expectant parents for childbirth and beyond, but their impact on womens pain management remains unclear. Therefore, this review aims to explore and map the contents and characteristics of existing antenatal education programmes that address labour and postpartum pain, which could inform future efforts to develop and optimise these programmes. MethodsThis review followed the PRISMA-ScR and Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. The protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (6597j). 11 electronic databases were systematically searched in November 2024. Eligible studies were screened independently by two reviewers using Rayyan software. Inclusion criteria focussed on quantitative trials of antenatal education programmes addressing labour and postpartum pain outcomes. Data were extracted and a narrative synthesis was completed to map intervention characteristics and outcomes. ResultsA total of 5,876 records were identified from the search strategy. A total of 12 articles met the eligibility and inclusion criteria, including seven randomised controlled trials and five quasi-experimental studies. The content and structure of antenatal education interventions between studies was heterogenous. Common themes included the distinction between "true and false labour pain" and breathing exercises. Face-to-face delivery of antenatal education was the preferred delivery method. ConclusionAntenatal education programmes contain limited information on labour and postpartum pain management, with little consistency across interventions. Non-pharmacological pain management strategies have the potential to address biopsychosocial factors of pain and support coping in labour. We recommend the development of interventions based on pain science education principles to support pain-management during labour and in the postpartum.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessment of awareness and attitudes of pregnant women toward labor epidural analgesia and factors influencing the decision to opt for it: A cross-sectional study. 96%
- Pain Expectations, Experiences and Coping Strategies Used By Post-operative Patients: A Descriptive Phenomelogical Study 95%
- Experiences of Indigenous peoples living with pelvic health conditions: A scoping review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Caesarean birth in public maternities in Argentina: a formative research study on the views of obstetricians, midwives, and trainees 94%
- Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review 94%
- Experience of induction of labour: a cross-sectional postnatal survey of women at UK maternity units 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Suitability of just-in-time adaptive intervention in post-COVID-19-related symptoms: A systematic scoping review 93%
- Sociodemographically Differential Patterns of Chronic Pain Progression Revealed by Analyzing the All of Us Research Program Data 93%
- Impact of electronic medical records on healthcare delivery in Nigeria: A Review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing a psychological support intervention to help injured athletes get Back in the Game 91%
- Knowledge, attitude and practice toward COVID-19 among healthcare workers in public health facilities, Eastern Ethiopia 90%
- Multimodal Pain Recognition in Postoperative Patients: A Machine Learning Approach 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.