Back

Design-driven optimization of low-cost reagent formulations for reproducible and high-yielding cell-free gene expression

Olsen, M. L.; Copeland, C. E.; Sundberg, C. A.; Aw, R.; Shaver, Z. M.; Rao, G.; Swartz, J. R.; Karim, A. S.; Jewett, M. C.

2025-08-01 synthetic biology
10.1101/2025.08.01.668204 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Access to recombinant proteins is vital in basic science and biotechnology research. Cell-free gene expression systems provide one approach to address this need, but widespread utilization remains limited by the cost, complexity, and inconsistency of current platforms. To address these limitations, we carry out a multi-dimensional definitive screening design to reduce the number of reagent components and remove costly secondary energy substrates. From more than 1,200 reagent formulations, we discover a simple and reproducible system based on 12 components. The optimized reagent formulation can produce 2.4 {+/-} 0.3 g/L of protein product at the 15-L scale ([~]$55/gprotein) and 3.7 {+/-} 0.2 g/L ([~]$36/gprotein) at the 4-mL scale with oxygen supplementation. This provides an 84 to 99% reduction in cost over previous cell-free reagent formulations. We further show that the optimized reagent formulation can produce nucleoside triphosphates from nucleotides and ribose and that it is robust to failure across batches of cell lysates, users/locations, and in the synthesis of different proteins. Specifically, we demonstrate the production of fifteen therapeutically relevant products, including full-length aglycosylated monoclonal antibodies. We anticipate that our optimized reagent formulation will further democratize the use of cell-free systems for protein manufacturing and synthetic biology applications.

Published in Nature Communications (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.