Back

Sequence mismatch between gene-drive and target-site flanking regions significantly impairs homing efficiency in Culex quinquefasciatus

Harvey-Samuel, T.; Kaur, R.; Leftwich, P. T.; Feng, X.; Gantz, V.; Alphey, L.

2025-08-01 synthetic biology
10.1101/2025.08.01.668174 bioRxiv
Show abstract

CRISPR/Cas9-based homing gene-drives (homing-drives) hold enormous potential as control tools for mosquito disease-vectors. These genomically-encoded technologies spread themselves through target populations by creating double-stranded DNA breaks on homologous chromosomes, into which the homing-drives are copied ( homed). Homing is dependent on sequence homology between the genomic regions flanking the transgene insertion and the break site. Homing efficiency (i.e. copying rate) substantially impacts the power of these systems: less efficient homing-drives spread slower, have fewer applications and are more resistance-prone. Understanding what influences homing-drive efficiency is therefore vital to the successful use of these technologies. Here we report a novel mechanism by which a homing-drives efficiency can be significantly impaired by natural sequence variation within a population into which it is spreading. Using a kmo-targeting split homing-drive in the West Nile virus mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus, we found that target-site heterology (sequence mismatch between the genomic regions flanking the target cut-site and the homing-drive transgene) of less than 10% reduced homing efficiency by up to 54%. While substantial research effort has been dedicated to increasing homing-drive efficiency through optimisation of within-construct components, our results highlight that the real-world efficacy of these systems may in part depend on variation beyond these controllable factors.

Published in GENETICS (predicted rank #11) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.