Back

Replication of 10 novel loci involved in human plasma protein N-glycosylation using MALDI-MS and UHPLC-FD data

Timoshchuk, A.; Naber, A.; Slieker, R.; Soplenkova, A.; Maslov, D.; Potapova, N. A.; Nicolardi, S.; Elders, P. J. M.; Sijbrands, E. J. G.; Sharapov, S.; Hart, L. M. t.; Hoek, M. v.; Wuhrer, M.; Aulchenko, Y. S.

2025-08-03 genetics
10.1101/2025.08.01.668131 bioRxiv
Show abstract

N-glycans are essential components of glycoproteins, influencing their properties and functions. While biochemical pathways of glycosylation are well-characterized, their genetic regulation remains poorly understood. This study utilizes matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-fluorescence detection (UHPLC-FD) to strengthen replication and further characterize previously identified genome-wide association signals for the total human plasma N-glycome (TPNG). Univariate and multivariate genetic association meta-analyses involved 3,385 samples across 143 N-glycome traits from the Hoorn Diabetes Care System and DiaGene cohorts as well as 3,224 samples across 117 N-glycome traits from TwinsUK, CEDAR, QMDiab and SABRE cohorts. We successfully replicated ten previously identified but not replicated glycosylation quantitative trait loci (glyQTLs) and prioritized five high-confidence putative causal genes, including the glycosyltransferase MGAT4B and inflammation-related genes - C3 and FCGR2B. The linkage-specific sialic acid derivatization in MALDI-MS enabled delineation of genetic effects on 2,3- and 2,6-sialylation. Mass spectrometry analysis also provided evidence for glucuronic acid-containing glycans in human blood plasma. These findings advance our understanding of the genetic regulation of protein N-glycosylation and highlight the complementarity of different analytical approaches in glycomics research.

Published in Glycobiology (predicted rank #5) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.