Back

Intrinsic differences in hamster and mouse macrophage biology correlate with susceptibility to L. donovani infection

Jenkins, P.; Danckaert, A.; Cokelaer, T.; Mahtal, N.; Pescher, P.; Späth, G. F.

2025-08-02 pathology
10.1101/2025.08.01.668127 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The basis for differential susceptibility to Leishmania (L.) donovani infection observed in individuals remains poorly understood. Here we address this important open question comparing bone marrow-derived macrophages from susceptible hamsters (hamBMDMs) and resistant mice (mBMDMs) to identify intrinsic cellular features that may contribute to host-specific outcomes. We first optimized and validated an experimental protocol for generating hamBMDMs, which closely resemble classical mouse BMDMs in terms of morphology, marker gene expression and phagocytic activity. Comparative transcriptomic analysis uncovered rodent-specific, intrinsic differences in the expression of metabolic and immune-related pathways known to influence susceptibility to intracellular Leishmania infection. In vitro infection assays confirmed the microbicidal capacity of hamBMDMs, while also revealing their increased permissiveness to Leishmania proliferation. In conclusion, the combined use of murine and hamster macrophage systems provides a powerful platform to dissect the molecular mechanisms underlying L. donovani survival and host resistance. Our improved protocol allows for the generation of large quantities of functionally validated hamster macrophages, enabling systems-level investigations in this important rodent model that more accurately reflects human infection dynamics than mice. This addresses a major bottleneck in experimental infections with L. donovani, but also other clinically relevant pathogens, such as Mycobacterium spp. and SARS-CoV-2, for which hamsters have been used to model human infection.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.