Distinct inhibitory connectivity motifs trigger distinct forms of anticipation in the retinal network
Ebert, S.; Cessac, B.
Show abstract
Motion is an important feature of visual scenes and retinal neuronal circuits selectively signal different motion features. It has been shown that the retina can extrapolate the position of a moving object, thereby compensating sensory transmission delays and enabling signal processing in real-time. Amacrine cells, the inhibitory interneurons of the retina, play essential roles in such computations although their precise function remain unclear. Here, we computationally explore the effect of two different inhibitory connectivity motifs on the retinas response to moving objects: feed-forward and recurrent feed-back inhibition. We show that both can account for motion anticipation with two different mechanisms. Feed-forward inhibition truncates motion responses and shifts peak responses forward via subtractive inhibition, whereas recurrent feedback coupling evokes, via divisive inhibition, excitatory and inhibitory waves with different phases that add up and shift the response peak. A key difference between the two mechanisms is how the peak response scales with the speed of a moving object. Motion prediction with feedforward circuits monotonically decreases with increasing speeds, while recurrent feedback coupling induces tuning curves that exhibit a preferred speed for which motion prediction is maximal.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Homeostatic control of synaptic rewiring in recurrent networks induces the formation of stable memory engrams 97%
- Dimensional Reduction of Emergent Spatiotemporal Cortical Dynamics via a Maximum Entropy Moment Closure 97%
- Temporal resolution of spike coding in feedforward networks with signal convergence and divergence 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Dynamic control of sequential retrieval speed in networks with heterogeneous learning rules 97%
- Beta oscillations and waves in motor cortex can be accounted for by the interplay of spatially-structured connectivity and fluctuating inputs 97%
- Mechanisms underlying the response of mouse cortical networks to optogenetic manipulation 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Passing the message: representation transfer in modular balanced networks 96%
- Synchronization, stochasticity and phase waves in neuronal networks with spatially-structured connectivity 96%
- Cross-frequency slow oscillation-spindle coupling in a biophysically realistic thalamocortical neural mass model 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.