Back

Beyond the Cut: Long-read sequencing reveals complex genomic and transcriptomic changes in AAV-CRISPR therapy for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Jia, M. S.; Padmaswari, M. H.; Burcham, L. A.; Agrawal, S.; Bulliard, G. N.; Stokes, A. L.; Nelson, C. E.

2025-08-01 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.08.01.668007 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Adeno associated virus (AAV)-mediated delivery of CRISPR associated nucleases (AAV-CRISPR) is a promising solution to treat genetic diseases such as Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) and is now in early clinical trials. However, genotoxicity and immunogenicity concerns have hindered clinical translation. Due to the complex etiology associated with DMD, the post-transduction consequences of double-stranded breaks induced by AAV-CRISPR in disease models are unclear. This barrier is partially conferred by conventional sequencing methods where common outcomes of AAV-CRISPR editing often escape detection. However, recent reports of novel long-read sequencing approaches permit comprehensive variant detection using a broader sequence context. Here, we comprehensively investigated genomic and transcriptomic post-AAV-CRISPR transduction consequences in myoblast cells and a DMD mouse model following intramuscular and intravenous AAV-CRISPR therapy using both long- and short-read sequencing techniques. Structural variant characterization indicates that unintended on-target large insertions and inversions are common editing outcomes. We demonstrate that combining adaptive sampling with nanopore Cas9-targeted sequencing (AS-nCATS) for long-read quantification of AAV integration is synergistic for detecting difficult-to-amplify editing events. This unbiased data suggests that full-length AAV integration is equally as probable as the on-target deletion. Further, we develop a Nanopore Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends (nRACE-seq) pipeline for long-read detection of unknown 5 or 3 ends of edited transcripts. The nRACE-seq approach effectively detects the presence of AAV-Dmd chimeric transcripts, erroneous splicing events, and off-target AAV integration sites. In summary, our findings offer insights into the adaptation of AAV-CRISPR DSB-mediated therapeutics for monogenic diseases and promote the standardization of CRISPR evaluation. We highlight the importance of coupling polymerase-based and polymerase-free methods in long-read sequencing to assess editing outcomes as the field progresses toward clinical applications.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
3
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.3%
4
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.8%
6
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.9%
7
The CRISPR Journal
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
10
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
11
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
14
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
15
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.3%
16
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
17
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
19
Molecular Therapy Methods & Clinical Development
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
20
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.9%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.9%
26
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
27
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
28
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
29
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
30
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.7%