Back

Structural and functional basis of PU.1-BAF interaction enables targeting of lineage-specific transcription

Sadalge, D.; Clasman, J. R.; Topal, S.; Musser, D.; Von der Porten, L.; Wu, S.; Schultz, S. E.; Austin, W. F.; Huang, D.; Setser, J. W.; Martinez, M. R.; Kiselar, J.; Hesler, S.; Blevins, S. J.; Turegun, B.; Palowitch, G.; Khalil, A.; Pulice, J. L.; Chance, M. R.; Wilson, K. J.; Nelen, M.; Lahr, D. L.; Sandoval, G. J.; Davenport, Y. W.; Bellon, S. F.; Taherbhoy, A. M.

2025-08-01 biochemistry
10.1101/2025.08.01.667454 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chromatin remodeling complexes like BAF finely regulate transcriptional programs by working in concert with transcription factors. However, evidence is lacking as to whether TFs interact directly with BAF and if so, what the mechanistic and structural principles governing these critical interactions are. Here, we establish direct engagement between a crucial and therapeutically relevant full-length human TF, PU.1 (SPI1), and BAF. Within this 1MDa+ complex, we precisely map the binding site of PU.1 to a YEATS-like domain on BAF60A and elucidate the structure of the PU.1-BAF60A complex. This work reveals that upon binding to BAF, a disordered region within the TF adopts a helical conformation, and that disruption of this functionally critical interface via knockdown abrogates the ability of PU.1 to rescue cell viability. To explore the druggability of TF-BAF protein-protein interactions (PPIs), we conducted a high-throughput screen that identified small molecules capable of disrupting the PU.1-BAF60A PPI by binding to BAF60A. Co-crystal structures reveal distinct compound binding modes that converge on a critical PU.1-BAF60A interaction hotspot. These findings define, for the first time, the structural interface between a human TF and a chromatin remodeling complex and establish a platform that enables the targeting of these interactions, a novel mechanism in cancer therapeutics.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.