Back

Mapping the costs of mental health- and substance use-related grant cancellations

Beccia, A. L.; Liu, L.; Delaney, S.; Zubizarreta, D.; Ross, N.; Austin, S. B.

2025-08-02 health economics
10.1101/2025.08.01.25332818 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSince the 2025 Presidential Inauguration, the Trump Administration has terminated billions of dollars in federal funding for science; however, the impacts of these grant terminations on the mental health and substance use fields have not yet been examined. We thus aimed to quantify and map the costs associated with federally funded mental health- and substance use-related grants that have been prematurely terminated. MethodsWe used a comprehensive dataset of grants terminated by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Science Foundation (NSF), and Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) compiled from multiple sources. After identifying terminated mental health- and substance use-related grants from this database via a two-step screening process, we quantified their number and associated lost funding for each congressional district, which we visualized using a series of maps to examine trends and regional variations. OutcomesWe identified 474 mental health- and/or substance use-related grants that were terminated by the NIH, NSF, or SAMHSA from February 28, 2025, through April 11, 2025, totaling $2,098,731,548 in lost funds. Congressional districts corresponding to urban centers with large academic and research institutions (e.g., New York City, Boston) experienced the most pronounced losses from NIH and NSF grants, whereas districts located throughout the Mid-Atlantic, Midwest, Southeast, and Southwest were the hardest hit by the termination of SAMHSA block grants (i.e., those used to pay for community mental health and substance use services). InterpretationAgainst a backdrop of ongoing and intersecting mental health and substance use crises, the Trump Administration has slashed research dollars on these topics, creating a chilling effect on the field. Such cuts are likely to destabilize existing mental health and substance use services and exacerbate inequities between and within U.S. states, ultimately intensifying the challenges faced by local communities. FundingNone to report.

Published in SSM - Mental Health · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.6%
2
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.1%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.8%
5
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
7
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
8
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
10
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
13
Medical Decision Making
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
14
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
15
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
16
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
17
International Journal of Drug Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.0%
19
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
20
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
22
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
25
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
26
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
28
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Biology of Sex Differences
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
30
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.6%