Back

Nutritional trends among children under the age of five in Zambia: A longitudinal analysis using Zambia Demographic Health Survey (2001-2018)

Mukubesa, N.; Kamulaza, L.; Sampa, M.; Chisiza, A.; Amatende, N.; Sabao, H.; Mutale, W.

2025-08-05 nutrition
10.1101/2025.08.01.25332726 medRxiv
Show abstract

ABSTRACTChildhood undernutrition, manifested as stunting, wasting, and underweight, remains a major public health challenge, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. In Zambia, the burden of undernutrition remains persistently high despite ongoing interventions. This study analyzed trends and determinants of nutritional status among children under five years using data from the Zambia Demographic and Health Survey (ZDHS) conducted in 2001, 2007, 2013-14, and 2018. The analysis assessed the prevalence of stunting, underweight, and wasting in children aged 0-59 months, using mean Z-scores and standard deviations. Logistic regression models were applied to identify key socio-demographic and health-related risk factors, with analyses performed in Python, accounting for survey design and weights. Findings revealed a notable decline in malnutrition: stunting dropped from 45.6% in 2001 to 34.7% in 2018; underweight from 27.3% to 11.6%; while wasting remained stable at approximately 4%. Severe stunting and underweight also decreased significantly, whereas severe wasting fluctuated. Prevalence rates were higher when excluding children under six months (left-truncated data), suggesting possible protection from early infancy due to exclusive breastfeeding. Key predictors of malnutrition included low birth weight, poverty, regional disparities, and diarrheal episodes. Despite progress, stunting remains a pressing concern. The higher rates observed in older infants point to the need for strengthened interventions targeting the postnatal period. Enhancing maternal and child health services, improving nutrition programs, and addressing poverty are critical to sustaining reductions in childhood malnutrition.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.5%
2
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.1%
3
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
5
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.3%
6
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.9%
8
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.4%
10
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.3%
12
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
13
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
14
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
17
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
18
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
21
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%