Stigma, Perception, and Lived Realities: An Ethnographic Study of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Rural Ethiopia
Haileselassie, B.; Zerihun, Z.; Mulugeta, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundCutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL) is a neglected tropical disease with profound physical, psychological, and social consequences, particularly in low-resource settings. In rural Ethiopia, Tigrai, CL remains poorly understood and heavily stigmatized, shaped by deeply rooted sociocultural perceptions that interpret the disease through supernatural, moral, and spiritual frameworks. These beliefs affect how affected individuals are perceived and treated within their communities, often resulting in social exclusion and delays in care. Methodology/principal findingsThis ethnographic study was conducted in rural districts of northern Ethiopia, Tigrai, using ethnographic field observations, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions with affected individuals, caregivers, Health Extension Workers (HEWs), and Community Advisory Group (CAG) members. Findings reveal that CL is widely perceived as a condition linked to divine punishment, impurity, or ancestral curses. These beliefs contribute to stigma, emotional distress, and restricted social participation, especially among women and children. Structural barriers including economic hardship, limited access to biomedical care, and poor health literacy further exacerbate the disease burden. While HEWs and CAGs attempt to address misconceptions and promote treatment uptake, their efforts are constrained by systemic resource limitations and community resistance. Conclusions/significanceCL in rural Ethiopia, Tigrai, is not only a biomedical issue but also a socially constructed and culturally embedded affliction. Addressing the disease requires a holistic public health response that integrates ethnographic insights, respects local belief systems, and prioritizes stigma reduction and community engagement. These findings contribute to a growing body of literature emphasizing the need for culturally sensitive, equity-driven approaches in global NTD programming. Author summaryCL is a skin disease caused by parasites and transmitted by sandflies. While it may not cause death, it often leads to visible skin scars that have serious emotional, social, and economic impacts especially in rural areas with limited access to healthcare. In this study, we explored how people living in rural Ethiopia, Tigrai region, experience and understand CL. Through interviews, focus group discussions, and field observations, we found that many community members believe CL is caused by supernatural forces, divine punishment, or moral wrongdoing. These beliefs cause people with CL to be stigmatized and socially excluded, particularly women and children. People often turn to traditional remedies instead of modern treatment, which delays recovery. We also learned that community health workers try to educate people and support treatment, but they face many challenges. Our study shows that treating CL should involve more than just medicine it must include efforts to reduce stigma, engage communities, and understand local beliefs. These findings can help improve public health programs for CL and similar neglected diseases.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Stakeholders Perspective of Integrating Female Genital Schistosomiasis into HIV Care: A Qualitative Study in Ghana 97%
- "It left me burnt": traditional treatment and stigma experiences of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Kalu district, Ethiopia 95%
- Patient insights research exploring disease awareness, patient life experience, and current management of visceral leishmaniasis in Bihar, India 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Awareness, knowledge, attitude and practice towards measures for prevention of the spread of COVID-19 in the Ugandans: A nationwide online cross-sectional Survey 93%
- Transnational adoptees in healthcare: barriers, resources, and needs 93%
- Cross-sector Decision Landscape in Response to COVID-19: A Qualitative Analysis of North Carolina Decision-Makers 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health-seeking behaviour and beliefs around sore throat in The Gambia: a qualitative study 96%
- Qualitative Study of Acceptability, Benefits, and Feasibility of a Food-based Intervention among Participants and Stakeholders of the RATIONS Trial 96%
- The cascading impacts of attacks on health in Syria: A qualitative study of health system and community impacts 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 self-testing in Nigeria: Stakeholders’ opinions and perspective on its value for case detection 96%
- Exploration of the Social Determinants of Diarrhoea, Rotavirus Vaccine Uptake, and Vaccine ‘Fatigue’ in Ethiopia, Kenya, and Malawi 96%
- Sexual health knowledge acquisition processes among very young adolescent girls in rural Malawi: Implications for sexual and reproductive health programs 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Omicron B.1.1.529 variant infections associated with severe disease are uncommon in a COVID-19 under-vaccinated, high SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence population in Malawi 91%
- Do children with disabilities have the same opportunities to play as children without disabilities? Evidence from the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys in 38 low and middle-income countries 91%
- COVID-19 in Wuhan: Immediate Psychological Impact on 5062 Health Workers 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.