Back

Post-COVID Spirometric Abnormalities in Workers with Intermittent High-Altitude Exposure: A Cross-Sectional Study in Peru

Gongora-Bendezu, J. A.; Martinez-Lopez, M. V.; Aguinaga-Fernandez, A. D.; Yovera-Aldana, M.

2025-08-03 occupational and environmental health
10.1101/2025.08.01.25332622 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionSARS-CoV-2 infection may lead to persistent pulmonary sequelae, particularly relevant among workers exposed to occupational stressors such as high altitude. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and associated factors of spirometric alterations in workers with a history of COVID-19 and intermittent exposure to high altitude. MethodsA cross-sectional analytical study was conducted in 400 sea-level-born workers intermittently exposed to altitudes above 2500 meters above sea level, all with a confirmed history of COVID-19. Only spirometry tests rated as quality A or B performed in 2024 were included. Sociodemographic, clinical, and occupational variables were evaluated. Adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) were estimated using Poisson regression with robust variance. ResultsA total of 72.2% of workers showed spirometric abnormalities: 40.5% had a mixed pattern, 20.8% restrictive, and 11.0% obstructive. Independent factors associated with altered spirometry included obesity (aPR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.19-1.53), high Charlson comorbidity index (aPR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.33-1.68), prior occupational exposure to harmful substances for over 5 years (aPR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.43-1.89), intermittent high-altitude exposure [≥]7 years (aPR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.60-2.05), and severe COVID-19 (aPR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.41-1.91). ConclusionsOver 70% of participants showed spirometric impairment was found in post-COVID-19 workers with intermittent high-altitude exposure. Respiratory function monitoring should be reinforced in this occupational group, especially among those with higher clinical and environmental risk factors.

Published in PLOS ONE (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.