Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Health Services and Policy Research literature for Primary Health Care: A Scoping Review protocol
Galvez Hernandez, P.; Audet, L.-A.; Shakeri, Z.; Wodchis, W. P.
Show abstract
ObjectiveArtificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are widely used in healthcare, primarily for clinical tasks like diagnostics and decision support. However, their role in organization- and system-level processes, such as resource allocation and workforce planning, remains underexplored. This scoping review aims to review AI and ML applications at the meso- and macro-levels of primary health care (PHC) systems reported in Health Services and Policy Research literature, assessing their strengths, limitations, and gaps to guide future research. MethodsThis scoping review will follow Arksey and OMalleys five-stage framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A comprehensive literature search will be conducted in Medline, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and IEEE Xplore, as well as grey literature from OpenGrey, Google Scholar, and ProQuest. The search will cover January 2010 to December 2024, with a final search update in 2025 prior to manuscript submission to ensure inclusion of the most current evidence. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts, and full texts, resolving discrepancies by consensus. Eligible studies will include primary research describing, evaluating, implementing, or developing AI and ML applications at the meso-level (e.g., organizational monitoring and evaluation) and macro-level (e.g., system-wide funding and workforce/resource allocation) in PHC. Studies on micro-level applications, non-implemented research, and secondary literature will be excluded. Data will be extracted using a protocol and synthesized based on meso- and macro-level PHC dimensions, adapted from WHOs operational and measurement frameworks. The protocol has been registered in Open Science Framework (OSF) (osf.io/wzj5x). ConclusionsThis review will synthesize AI and ML applications in organizational and structural dimensions of PHC, highlighting understudied areas and informing future research and policy. The findings will provide insights into AI and MLs strengths and limitations in supporting critical PHC elements, such as governance, resource allocation and workforce planning.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Scoping Review Protocol on Integration of mobile-linked POC diagnostics in community-based healthcare: User Experience 94%
- Essential Indicators of Quality in Primary Care Settings: An Evidence-Based, Structured, Expert Approach 94%
- US Primary Care in 2029: A Delphi Survey on the Impact of Machine Learning 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 96%
- Implementation Science Protocol for a participatory, theory-informed implementation research programme in the context of health system strengthening in sub-Saharan Africa (ASSET-ImplementER) 94%
- Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions in health organisations after patient safety incidents: a protocol for a scoping review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of unstructured text in prognostic clinical prediction models: a systematic review 94%
- Using telehealth consultations for healthcare provision to patients from racial/ethnic minorities: A systematic review 94%
- Gaps in Artificial Intelligence Research for Rural Health in the United States: A Scoping Review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 95%
- Measures of socioeconomic advantage are not independent predictors of support for healthcare AI: subgroup analysis of a national Australian survey 94%
- Cracking the Code: A Scoping Review to Unite Disciplines in Tackling Legal Issues in Health Artificial Intelligence 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measures to assess quality of postnatal care: a scoping review 93%
- Examining National Health Insurance Fund Members’ preferences and trade-offs for the attributes of contracted outpatient facilities in Kenya: a discrete choice experiment 92%
- Improving the quality of in-patient neonatal routine data as a pre-requisite for monitoring and improving quality of care at scale: A multi-site retrospective cohort study in Kenyan hospitals 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.